Skip to content


Boston and Maine Railroad Vs. United States - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

US Supreme Court

Decided On

Case Number

371 U.S. 26

Appellant

Boston and Maine Railroad

Respondent

United States

Excerpt:


boston & maine railroad v. united states - 371 u.s. 26 (1962) u.s. supreme court boston & maine railroad v. united states, 371 u.s. 26 (1962) 371 u.s. 26 boston & maine railroad et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of massachusetts. no. 230. decided october 15, 1962. 208 f. supp. 661, affirmed. joseph f. eshelman, james garfield, conrad w. oberdorfer, kenneth h. lundmark, r. g. bleakney, jr., r. d. brooks, r. b. claytor, e. a. kaier, w. t. pierson and d. m. tolmie for appellants. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general loevinger, robert b. hummel, elliott h. moyer and robert w. ginnane for the united states and the interstate commerce commission. r. wray henriott, w. l. grubbs and joseph l. lenihan for the louisville & nashville railroad co. et al., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice white took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 371 u.s. 26, 27

Judgment:


BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD v. UNITED STATES - 371 U.S. 26 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 26 (1962) 371 U.S. 26

BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 230.
Decided October 15, 1962.

208 F. Supp. 661, affirmed.

Joseph F. Eshelman, James Garfield, Conrad W. Oberdorfer, Kenneth H. Lundmark, R. G. Bleakney, Jr., R. D. Brooks, R. B. Claytor, E. A. Kaier, W. T. Pierson and D. M. Tolmie for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Elliott H. Moyer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

R. Wray Henriott, W. L. Grubbs and Joseph L. Lenihan for the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 371 U.S. 26, 27




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //