Bare Act Search Results

The Seacom Skills University Act, 2014 Complete Act

State: West Bengal

Year: 2014

.....conducted by the University or by Common Entrance Test conducted at the State or National level: Provided that any achievements in co-curricular activities or extra-curricular activities may be given weightage at the discretion of the University: Provided further that the admission criteria for specific courses, as prescribed by the concerned Regulatory Bodies, shall be adhered to. (3) The seats in Engineering and Technology courses in the University or the colleges and other institutions subsumed in the University, shall be guided by the existing framework of the All India entrance examination or the West Bengal Joint Entrance Board through its state level common entrance test and counseling process until the University opts to work out its own entrance examination framework for admission into the courses as per the decision of the Governing Board. (4) The University shall keep five percent of total intake reserved for filling up with economically weaker persons in the manner as may be prescribed by the State Government from time to time. Examinations and results:- 35. (1) The University shall at the beginning of each academic session and in any case not later than 31st of.....

Indian Contract Act, 1872 Section 212

Title: Skill and Diligence Required from Agent

State: Central

Year: 1872

.....as is generally possessed by persons engaged in similar business, unless the principal has notice of his want of skill. The agent is always bound to act with reasonable diligence, and to use such skill as he possesses; and to make compensation to his principal in respect of the direct consequences of his own neglect, want of skill or misconduct, but not in respect of loss or damage which are indirectly or remotely caused by such neglect, want of skill or misconduct. Illustration (a) A, a merchant in Calcutta, has an agent, B, in London, to whom a sum of money is paid on A's account, with orders to remit. B retains the money for a considerable time. A, in consequence of not receiving the money, becomes insolvent. B is liable for the money and interest from the day on which it ought to have been paid, according to the usual rate, and for any further direct lossas, e.g., by variation of rate of exchangebut not further. (b) A, an agent for the sale of goods, having authority to sell on credit, sells to B on credit, without making the proper and usual enquiries as to the solvency of B. B, at the time of such sale, is insolvent. A must make compensation to his principal in respect.....

Karnataka Police Act, 1963 Section 176

Title: Saving of Games of Skill

State: Karnataka

Year: 1963

For the removal of doubts it is hereby declared that the provisions of sections 79 and 80 shall not be applicable to the playing of any pure game of skill and to wagering by persons taking part in such game of skill.

Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, (Maharashtra) Section 13

Title: Saving of Games of Mere Skill

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1887

Nothing in this Act shall be held to apply to any game of mere skill wherever played.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 259

Title: Case Before High Court to Be Heard by Not Less Than Two Judges (Omitted)

State: Central

Year: 1961

1[***] _________________________________ 1. Omitted by the National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005, with effect from 28th December, 2005. Prior to omission, section 259 stood as under: 259. Case before High Court to be heard by not less than two Judges. (1) When any case has been referred to the High Court under section 256, it shall be heard by a Bench of not less than two Judges of the High Court, and shall be decided in accordance with the opinion of such Judges or of the majority, if any, of such Judges. (2) Where there is no such majority, the Judges shall state the point of law upon which they differ, and the case shall then be heard upon that point only by one or more of the other Judges of the High Court, and such point shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority of the Judges who have heard the case including those who first heard it.

Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 35J

Title: Case Before High Court to Be Heard by Not Less Than Two Judges

State: Central

Year: 1944

1[xxx] ________________________________ 1. Omitted by the National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005. Prior to omission, it read as under: "35J. Case before High Court to be heard by not less than two Judges. -- (1) When any case has been referred to the High Court under section 35G or section 35H, it shall be heard by a Bench of not less than two Judges of the High Court and shall be decided in accordance with the opinion of such Judges or of the majority, if any, of such Judges. (2) Where there is no such majority, the Judges shall state the point of law upon which they differ and the case shall then be heard upon that point only by one or more of the other Judges of the High Court, and such point shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority of the Judges who have heard the case including those who first heard it."

Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946, (Maharashtra) Section 40A

Title: Model Standing Orders in Respect of Additional or Altered Matters to Apply to Certain Workmen, if They Are Not Less Advantageous

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1946

1[40A. Model standing orders in respect of additional or altered matters to apply to certain workmen, if they are not less advantageous Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this Chapter, any model standing orders made and notified in this Official Gazette by the State Government from time to time, in respect of any additional matters included in Schedule I, or any alteration made in that Schedule, on or after the date of commencement of Bombay Industrial Relations (Amendment) Act, 1977 (Mah. XLVII of 1977), shall unless such model standing orders are held by the Commissioner of Labour, to be less advantageous to the employees than the corresponding standing orders applicable to them, also apply in relation to such employees in the undertakings in respect of which standing orders have already been settled under section 35]. ___________________________ 1. This section was added by Mah. 47 of 1977, s. 5.

Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 15

Title: Wages of Worker Who Works for Less Than Normal Working Day

State: Central

Year: 1948

If an employee whose minimum rate of wages has been fixed under this Act by the day works on any day on which he was employed for a period less than the requisite number of hours constituting a normal working day, he shall, save as otherwise hereinafter provided, be entitled to receive wages in respect of work done by him on that day as if he had worked for a full normal working day: Provided, however, that he shall not be entitled to receive wages for a full normal working day-- (i) in any case where his failure to work is caused by his unwillingness to work and not by the omission of the employer to provide him with, and (ii) in such other cases and circumstances as may be prescribed.

Government of India Act, 1858 [Repealed] Section 35

Title: Not Less Than One Tenth of Persons Recommended for Military Cadetships to Be Selected from Sons of Persons Who Have Served in India

State: Central

Year: 1858

Not less than One Tenth of the whole Number of Persons to be recommended in any Year for Military Cadetships (other than Cadetships in the Engineers and Artillery) shall be selected according to such Regulations as the Secretary of State in Council may from Time to Time make in this Behalf from among the Sons of Persons who have served in India in the Military or Civil Services of Her Majesty, or of the East India Company.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260B

Title: Case Before High Court to Be Heard by Not Less Than Two Judges

State: Central

Year: 1961

(1) When an appeal has been filed before the High Court under section 260A, it shall be heard by a Bench of not less than two Judges of the High Court, and shall be decided in accordance with the opinion of such Judges or of the majority, if any, of such Judges. (2) Where there is no such majority, the Judges shall state the point of law upon which they differ and the case shall then be heard upon that point only by one or more of the other Judges of the High Court and such point shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority of the Judges who have heard the case including those who first heard it.]