Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: section 215 Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 17 results (0.002 seconds)Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 215
Title: Taking Gift to Help to Recover Stolen Property, Etc.
State: Central
Year: 1860
Whoever takes or agrees or consents to take any gratification under pretence or on account of helping any person to recover any movable property of which he shall have been deprived by any offence punishable under this Code, shall, unless he uses all means in his power to cause the offender to be apprehended and convicted of the offence, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Contract Act, 1872 Section 215
Title: Right of Principal when Agent Deals, on His Own Account, in Business of Agency Without Principal Consent
State: Central
Year: 1872
If an agent deals on his own account in the business of the agency, without first obtaining the consent of his principal and acquainting him with all material circumstances which have come to his own knowledge on the subject, the principal may repudiate the transaction, if the case shows either that any material fact has been dishonestly concealed from him by the agent, or that the dealings of the agent have been disadvantageous to him. Illustration (a) A directs B to sell A's estate. B buys the estate for himself in the name of C. A, on discovering that B has bought the estate for himself, may repudiate the sale, if he can show that B has dishonestly concealed any material fact, or that the sale has been disadvantageous to him. (b) A directs B to sell A's estate. B, on looking over the estate before selling it, finds a mine on the estate which is unknown to A. B informs A that he wishes to buy the estate for himself, but conceals the discovery of the mine. A allows B to buy in ignorance of the existence of the mine. A, on discovering that B knew of the mine at the time he bought the estate, may either repudiate or adopt the sale at his option.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCantonments Act, 1924 Section 215
Title: Powers of Entry and Seizure
State: Central
Year: 1924
.....for sale or deposited in or brought to any place for the purpose of sale, or of preparation for sale, or any utensil or vessel for preparing, manufacturing or containing any such article, or thing, and may enter into and inspect any place used as a slaughter-house and may examine any animal or article therein; (b) may seize any such animal, article or thing which appears to him to be diseased, or unwholesome or unfit for human food or drink or medicine, as the case may be, or to be adulterated or to be not what it is represented to be, or any such utensil or vessel which is of such a kind or in such a state as to render any article prepared, manufactured or contained therein unwholesome or unfit for human food or for medicine as the case may be. (2) Any article seized under sub-section (1) which is of a perishable nature may, under the orders of the Health Officer or the Assistant Health Officer, forthwith be destroyed if, in his opinion, it is diseased, unwholesome or unfit for human food, drink or medicine, as the case may be. (3) Every animal, article, utensil, vessel or other thing seized under sub-section (1) shall, if it is not destroyed under sub-section (2), be.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Succession Act, 1925 Section 215
Title: Effect on Certificate of Subsequent Probate or Letters of Administration
State: Central
Year: 1925
Section 215 - Effect on certificate of subsequent probate or letters of administration (1) A grant of probate or letters of administration in respect of an estate shall be deemed to supersede any certificate previously granted under Part X or under the Succession Certificate Act, 18891 (7 of 1889), or Bombay Regulation No. VIII of 1827, in respect of any debts or securities included in the estate. (2) When at the time of the grant of the probate or letters any suit or other proceeding instituted by the holder of any such certificate regarding any such debt or security is pending, the person to whom the grant is made shall, on applying to the Court in which the suit or proceeding is pending, be entitled to take the place of the holder of the certificate in the suit or proceeding: Provided that, when any certificate is superseded under this section, all payments made to the holder of such certificate in ignorance of such supersession shall be held good against claims under the probate or letters of administration. ______________________ 1. Repealed partly by Act 39 of 1925 and finally by Act 1 of 1938.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionGovernment of India Act, 1935 [Repealed] Section 215
Title: Ancillary Powers of Federal Court
State: Central
Year: 1935
1 [215.Ancillary powers of Federal Court The FederalLegislature may make provision by Act for conferring upon the Federal Courtsuch supplemental powers not inconsistent with any of the provisions this Act asmay appear to be necessary or desirable for the purpose of enabling the courtmore effectively to exercise the jurisdiction conferred upon it by or under thisAct. ________________________ 1.This section came into force on 29-7-1937, under Government of India (FederalCourt) Order, 1937, para 3.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCompanies Act, 1956 Section 215
Title: Authentication of Balance-sheet and Profit and Loss Account
State: Central
Year: 1956
.....of the Board of directors- (i) in the case of banking company, by the persons specified in clause (a) or clause (b), as the case may be, of sub-section (2) of section 29 of the Banking Companies Act, 1949 (10 of 1949); (ii) in the case of any other company, by its1[***]manager or secretary, if any, and by not less than two directors of the company one of whom shall be a managing director where there is one. (2) In the case of a company not being a banking company, when only one of its directors is for the time being in India, the balance-sheet and the profit and loss account shall be signed by such director; but in such a case there shall be attached to the balance-sheet and the profit and loss account a statement signed by him explaining the reason for non-compliance with the provisions of sub-section (1). (3) The balance-sheet and the profit and loss account shall be approved by the Board of directors before they are signed on behalf of the Board in accordance with the provisions of this section and before they are submitted to the auditors for their report thereon. ____________________ 1 . The words "managing agent, secretaries and treasurers," omitted by Act.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMerchant Shipping Act, 1958 Section 215
Title: Offences in Respect of Official Logs
State: Central
Year: 1958
(1) An official log book shall be kept in the manner required by this Act, and an entry directed by this Act to be made therein shall be made at the time and in the manner directed by this Act. (2) No person shall make or procure to be made or assist in making any entry in any official log book in respect of any occurrence happening previously to the arrival of the ship at her final port of discharge more than twenty-four hours after such arrival.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIncome Tax Act, 1961 Section 215
Title: Interest Payable by Assessee
State: Central
Year: 1961
.....under this section. (5) In this section and sections 217 and 273, assessed tax means the tax determined on the basis of the regular assessment (reduced by the amount of tax deductible in accordance with the provisions of sections 192 to 194, section 194A, section 194C, section 194D, section 195 and section 196A), so far as such tax relates to income subject to advance tax and so far as it is not due to variations in the rates of tax made by the Finance Act enacted for the year for which the regular assessment is made. (6) Where, in relation to an assessment year, an assessment is made for the first time under section 147, the assessment so made shall be regarded as a regular assessment for the purposes of this section and sections 216, 217 and 273. ________________ 1. See rule 40. For analysis, see Mashbras Income-tax Rules.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionKarnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 Section 215
Title: Displacing Pavements, Etc.
State: Karnataka
Year: 1964
(1) Whoever displaces, takes up, or makes any alteration in the pavement, gutter, flags, or other materials, of any public street, or the fences, walls, or posts thereof, or any municipal lamp, lamp-post, bracket, water-post, hydrant, or other such municipal property therein, without the written consent of the municipal council or other lawful authority, shall be punished with fine which may extend to one hundred rupees. (2) Any person who, having displaced, taken up or made alteration inany such pavement, gutter, flags, or other materials, or in the fence, walls, posts, municipal lamps, lamp-posts, brackets, water-posts, hydrants, or other municipal property of any public street, fails to replace or restore the same to the satisfaction of the municipal council after notice to do so, shall be punished with fine which may extend to fifty rupees, and shall pay any expenses which may be incurred in restoring the same and such expenses shall be recoverable in the same manner as an amount claimed on account of any tax recoverable under Chapter VII.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCode of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 215
Title: Effect of Errors
State: Central
Year: 1973
.....he became possessed thereof that such coin was counterfeit," the word " fraudulently" being omitted in the charge. Unless it appears that A was in fact misled by this omission, the error shall not be regarded as material. (b) A is charged with cheating B, and the manner in which he cheated B is not set out in the charge, or is set out incorrectly. A defends himself, calls witnesses and gives his own account of the transaction. The Court may infer from this that the omission to set out the manner of the cheating is not material. (c) A is charged with cheating B, and the manner in which he cheated B is not set out in the-charge. There were many transactions between A and B, and A had no means of knowing to which of them the charge referred, and offered no defence. The Court may infer from such facts that the omission to set out the manner of the cheating was, in the case, a material error. (d) A is charged with the murder of Khoda Baksh on the 21st January, 1882. In fact, the murdered person's name was Haidar Baksh, and the dale of the murder was the 20th January, 1882. A was never charged with any murder but one, and had heard the inquiry before the Magistrate, which.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial