Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: section 102 Page 4 of about 74 results (0.003 seconds)Bombay Police Act, 1951, (Maharashtra) Section 102
Title: Causing Any Obstruction in a Street
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1951
No person shall cause obstruction in any street or public place by allowing any animal or vehicle which has to be loaded or unloaded, or to take up or set down passengers, to remain or stand therein longer than may be necessary of such purpose or by leaving any vehicle standing or fastening any cattle therein, or using any part of a street or public place as a halting place for vehicles or cattle, or by leaving any box bale, package or other thing whatsoever in or upon a street for an unreasonable length of time or contrary to any regulation made and published by a competent authority by exposing anything for sale or setting out anything for sale in or upon any stall, booth, board, cask, basket or in any other way whatsoever.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionRepresentation of the People Act, 1951 Section 102
Title: Procedure in Case of an Equality of Votes
State: Central
Year: 1951
If during the trial of an election petition it appears that there is an equality of votes between any candidates at the election and that the addition of a vote would entitle any of those candidates to be declared elected, then- (a) any decision made by the returning officer under the provisions of this act shall, in so far as it determines the question between those candidates, be effective also for the purposes of the petition; and (b) in so for as that question is not determined by such a decision1[the High court] shall decide between them by lot and proceed as if the one on whom the lot then falls had received an additional vote. ______________________ 1. Substituted by Act 47 of 1966, Section 42, for "the tribunal" w.e.f. 14-12-1966.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMajor Port Trusts Act, 1963 Section 102
Title: Accounts and Audit
State: Central
Year: 1963
.....to him by the Board in respect of such audit shall be debatable to the general account of the Board.] (3) The Comptroller and Auditor-General of India or any person appointed by him in connection with the audit of the accounts of a Board shall have the same rights, privileges and authority in connection with such audit as the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India has in connection with the audit of Government accounts and, in particular, shall have the right to demand the production of books of accounts, connected vouchers and other documents of the Board. ________________________ 1. Substituted by the Major Port Trusts (Amendment) Act (29 of 1974), Section 31 (1-2-1975),
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionArmy Act, 1950 Section 102
Title: Duty of Commanding Officer in Regard to Detention
State: Central
Year: 1950
(1) It shall be the duly of every commanding officer to lake care that a person under his command when charged with an offence is not detained in custody for more than forty-eight hours after the committal of such person into custody is reported to him, without the charge being investigated, unless investigation within that period seems to him to be impracticable having regard to the public service. (2) The case of every person being detained in custody beyond a period of forty-eight hours, and the reason thereof, shall be reported by the Commanding Officer to the General or other officer to whom application would be made to convene a general or district court-martial for the trial of the person charged. (3) In reckoning the period of forty-eight hours specified in sub-section (1), Sundays and other public holidays shall be excluded. (4) Subject to the provisions of this Act, the Central Government may make rules providing for the manner in which and the period for which any person subject to this Act may be taken into and detained in military custody, pending the trial by any competent authority for any offence committed by him.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndo-tibetan Border Police Force Act, 1992 Section 102
Title: Documents Exempted from Production
State: Central
Year: 1992
(1) Nothing in section 101 shall be deemed to affect the operation of sections 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 or to apply to any letter, postcard, telegra or other document in the custody of the postal or telegraph authorities. (2) If any document in such custody is, in the opinion of any District Magistrate, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court of Sessions or High Court wanted for the purpose of any Force Court, such Magistrate, or Court may require the postal or telegraph authorities, as the case may be, to deliver such document to such person as such Magistrate or Court may direct. (3) If any such document is, in the opinion of any other Magistrate or of any Commissioner of Police or District Superintendent of Police, wanted for any such purpose, he may require the postal or telegraph authorities, as the case may be, to cause such search to be made for, and to detain such document pending the orders of any such District Magistrate, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court of Sessions or High Court.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMotor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 102
Title: Cancellation or Modification of Scheme
State: Central
Year: 1988
(1) The State Government may, at any time, if it considers necessary, in the public interest so to do, modify any approved scheme after giving (i) the State Transport Undertaking; and (ii) any other person who, in the opinion of the State Government, is likely to be affected by the proposed modification, an opportunity of being heard in respect of the proposed modification. (2) The State Government shall publish any modification proposed under sub-section (1) in the Official Gazette and in one of the newspapers in the regional languages circulating in the area in which it is proposed to be covered by such modification, together with the date, not being less than thirty days from such publication in the Official Gazette, and the time and place at which any representation received in this behalf will be heard by the State Government.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionManipur Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 Section 102
Title: Power of State Government to Rescind or Suspend Resolution of a Gram Panchayat or Zilla Parishad
State: Central
Year: 1994
(1) The State Government may, within a period of six months, by order in writing, rescind any resolution passed by a Gram Punchayat or a Zilla Parishad, if in its opinion such resolution,-- (a) has not been legally passed; or (b) is in excess, or abuse of the powers conferred by, or under this Act or in rules made thereunder. (2) The State Government shall, before taking any such action under sub-section (i) give the Gram Panchayat or the Zilla Parishad concerned an opportunity for making representation against the proposed order.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMulti-state Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 Section 102
Title: Interlocutory Orders
State: Central
Year: 2002
Where an appeal is made under section 99, the appellate authority may, in order to prevent the ends of justice being defeated, make such interlocutory orders, including an order of stay pending the decision of the appeal as such authority may deem fit.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionFactories Act, 1948 Section 102
Title: Power of Court to Make Orders
State: Central
Year: 1948
.....order (which the court may, if it thinks fit and on application in such behalf, from time to time extend) to take such measures as may be so specified for remedying the matters in respect of which the offence was committed. (2) Where an order is made under sub-section (1) the occupier or manager of the factory, as the case may be, shall not be liable under this Act in respect of the continuation of the offence during the period or extended period, if any, allowed by the Court, but if, on the expiry of such period or extended period, as the case may be, the order or the Court has not been fully complied with, the occupier or manager, as the case may be, shall be deemed to have committed a further offence, and may be sentenced therefore by the Court to undergo imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months or to pay a fine which may extend to one hundred rupees for every day after such expiry on which the order has not been complied with, or both to undergo such imprisonment and to pay such fine, as aforesaid.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionSashastra Seema Bal Act 2007 Section 102
Title: Documents Exempted from Production
State: Central
Year: 2007
(1) Nothing in section 101 shall be deemed to affect the operation of sections 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872,(1 of 1872 ) or to apply to any letter, postcard, telegram or other document in the custody of the postal or telegraph authorities. (2) If any document in such custody is, in the opinion of any District Magistrate, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court of Sessions or High Court wanted for the purpose of any Force Court, such Magistrate or Court may require the postal or telegraph authorities, as the case may be, to deliver such document to such person as such Magistrate or Court may direct, (3) If any such document is, in the opinion of any other magistrate or of any Commissioner of Police or District Superintendent of Police, wanted for any such purpose, he may require the postal or telegraph authorities, as the case may be, to cause such search to be made for, and to detain such document pending the orders of any such District Magistrate, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court of Sessions or High Court.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial