Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: pauperize State: central Page 1 of about 30 results (0.005 seconds)Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialLepers Act, 1898 Section 8
Title: Procedure with Regard to Pauper Lepers
State: Central
Year: 1898
.....that the person is a leper,and may for this purpose adjourn the enquiry form time to time, remanding theperson for observation or for other reason to such place as may be convenient,or admitting him to bail ; Providedalso that if any friend or relative of any person found to be a pauper lepershall undertake in writing to the satisfaction of the Magistrate that suchpauper leper shall be properly taken care of and shall be prevented frompublicly begging in any area specified under section 3, the Magistrate, insteadof sending the leper to any asylum, may make the leper over to the car of suchfriend or relative, requiring him, if he thinks fit, to enter into a bond withone or more sureties, to which the provisions of section 514 of the code ofcriminal Procedure (10 of 1882.) {See now the Code of Criminal Procedure,1898 (5 of 1898).} shall be applicable. (2)If the Magistrate finds that such person is not a leper, or that, if a leper, heis not a pauper leper, he shall forthwith discharge him.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionLimitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963) Section 13
Title: Exclusion of Time in Cases Where Leave to Sue or Appeal as a Pauper is Applied for
State: Central
Year: 1963
In computing the period of limitation prescribed for any suit or appeal in any case where an application for leave to sue or appeal as a pauper has been made and rejected, the time during which the applicant has been prosecuting in good faith his application for such leave shall be excluded, and the court may, on payment of the court fees prescribed for such suit or appeal, treat the suit or appeal as having the same force and effect as if the court fees had been paid in the first instance.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionLepers Act, 1898 Section 6
Title: Arrest of Pauper Lepers
State: Central
Year: 1898
(1) Within any local area which has been specified under section 3 any police-officer {Ins. by section 5.ibid.[ or any other person specially empowered by the State Government by order in writing in this behalf] may arrest without a warrant any person who appears to him to be a pauper leper. (2) Such police-officer {Ins. by section 5.ibid.} [ or other person] shall forthwith take or send the person so arrested to the nearest convenient police-station.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionManipur Municipalities Act, 1994 Section 160
Title: Burial of Paupers and Unclaimed Dead Bodies
State: Central
Year: 1994
The municipality may from time to time, out of the Municipal fund provide for the burial or burning of paupers and unclaimed dead bodies, free of charge, within the limits of the municipality or otherwise arrange to dispose of as it thinks fit.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionLepers Act, 1898 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1898
.....(2)Pondicherry by Regn.7 of l963; (3) Laccadive, Minicoy and Amindivi Islands by Regn. 8 of 1965. Hyderabad Leprosy Act (Andh. Pra. Act 4 of 1954) has been extended to the whole State of Andhra Pradesh by Andh. Pra. Act 20 of 1963 - Seesection 12,. Applied to Chandigarh by Chd. Admn. Gaz., 9-2-1973, Ext,. p. 237. "- -Repealed in - Gujarat by Guj. Act 4 of 1990. Assam by Assam Act 13 of 1990. Nagaland by Naga. Act 6 of 1990. Meghalaya by Megha. Act 3 of 1990. West Bengal by W.B. Act 15 of 1985. Tamil Nadu by T.N, Act 22 of 1987. Tripura by Tripura Act I of J 985. Punjab by Punj. Act 8 of 1993. Karnataka by Krna. Act 25 of 1989. Orissa by Orissa Act 1 of 1987. Himachal Pradesh by H. P. Act 14 of 1988. U. T. of Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshadweep, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Chandigarh by Central Act 47 of 1983. Manipur by Mani. Act 6 of 1989 Maharashtra : Gujarat : Mysore (Bombay Area): in the long title and the Preamble of the Lepers Act, 1898, in its application to the whole State of Bombay (now split up into the Stales of Gujarat and Maharashtra), the word "pauper". - Bom. Act 28 of 1955, section 2(16 -9-1955): Guj. A. L. (8th Am.) 0......
List Judgments citing this sectionCode of Civil Procedure, 1908 Appendix G
Title: Appeal, Reference and Review
State: Central
Year: 1908
.....on the .................... day of .................... 19 ............ the .................... files this memorandum of cross objection under rule 22 of Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and sets forth the following grounds of objection to the decree appealed from, namely:- ...................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................... No.9 DECREE IN APPEAL (O. XLI, r. 35) (Title) Appeal No. .................... of 19 ............ from the decree of the Court of .................... dated the .................... day of .................... 19.... Memorandum of Appeal .............................................................................................................Plaintiff. .............................................................................................................Defendant. The ....................above-named appeals to the ............................. Court at .................... from the decree of............................ in the.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe Limitation Act, 1963 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1963
.....31-8-1967).2 Orissa Act 24 of 1967, S 3 (w.e.f. 31-8-1967). SECTION 29: SAVINGS (1) Nothing in this Act shall affect section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872). (2) Where any special or local, law prescribes for any suit, appeal or application a period of limitation different from the period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of section 3 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the Schedule and for the purpose of determining any period of limitation prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by any special or local law, the provisions contained in sections 4 to 24 (inclusive) shall apply only in so far as, and to the extent to which, they are not expressly excluded by such special or local law. (3) Save as otherwise provided in any law for the time being in force with respect to marriage and divorce, nothing in this Act shall apply to any suit or other proceeding under any such law. (4) Sections 25 and 26 and the definition of "easement" in section 2 shall not apply to cases arising in the territories to which the Indian Easements Act, 1882 (5 of 1882) may for the time being extend. SECTION 30: PROVISION FOR SUITS, ETC., FOR WHICH.....
List Judgments citing this sectionCode of Civil Procedure, 1908 Appendix H
Title: Miscellaneous
State: Central
Year: 1908
.....of parties as to issues to be tried (Order XIV, rule 6) (Title) whereas we, the parties in the above suit, are agreed as to the question of fact [or of law] to be decided between us and the point at issue between us is whether a claim founded on a bond, dated the ..................... day of..................... 19........./20....,and filed as Exhibit..................... in the said suit, is or is not beyond the statute of limitation (or state the point at issue whatever it may be): We therefore severally bind ourselves that, upon the finding of the Court in the negative [or affirmative] of such issue, ..................... will pay to the said ..................... the sum of Rupees ..................... (or such sum as the Court shall hold to be due thereon), and I, the said ..................... , will accept the said sum of Rupees ..................... (or such sum as the Court shall hold to be due) in full satisfaction of my claim on the bond aforesaid [or that upon such finding I, the said ..................... ., will do or abstain from doing, etc.] .....................................................................................................Plaintiff......
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionLimitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963) Part II
Title: Limitation of Suits, Appeals and Applications
State: Central
Year: 1963
.....satisfies the court that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal or making the application within such period. Explanation.--The fact that the appellant or the applicant was misled by any order, practice or judgment of the High Court in ascertaining or computing the prescribed period may be sufficient cause within the meaning of this section. Section 6 - Legal disability (1) Where a person entitled to institute a suit or make an application for the execution of a decree is, at the time from which the prescribed period is to be reckoned, a minor or insane, or an idiot, he may institute the suit or make the application within the same period after the disability has ceased, as would otherwise have been allowed from the time specified therefor in the third column of the Schedule. (2) Where such person is, at the time from which the prescribed period is to be reckoned, affected by two such disability, or where, before his disability has ceased, he is affected by another disability, he may institute the suit or make the application within the same period after both disabilities have ceased, as would otherwise have been allowed from the time so specified. .....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionLimitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963) Section 3
Title: Bar of Limitation
State: Central
Year: 1963
(1) Subject to the provisions contained in sections 4 to 24 (inclusive), every suit instituted, appeal preferred, and application made after the prescribed period shall be dismissed although limitation has not been set up as a defence. (2) For the purposes this Act-- (a) a suit is instituted-- (i) in an ordinary case, when the plaint is presented to the proper officer; (ii) in the case of a pauper, when his application for leave to sue as a pauper is made; and (iii) in the case of a claim against a company which is being wound up by the court, when the claimant first sends in his claim to the official liquidator; (b) any claim by way of a set off or a counter claim, shall be treated as a separate suit and shall be deemed to have been instituted-- (i) in the case of a set off, on the same date as the suit in which the set off is pleaded; (ii) in the case of a counter claim, on the date on which the counter claim is made in court; (c) an application by notice of motion in a High Court is made when the application is presented to the proper officer of that court.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial