Bare Act Search Results

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1947

.....wishes which are merely spiritual or religious in nature), whether or not,- (i) any capital has been invested for the purpose of carrying on such activity; or (ii) such activity is carried on with a motive to make any gain or profit, and includes- (a) any activity of the Dock Labour Board established under section 5A of the Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 (9 of 1949) ; (b) any activity relating to the promotion of sales or business or both carried on by an establishment, but does not include- (1) any agricultural operation except where such agricultural operation is carried on in an integrated manner with any other activity (being any such activity as is referred to in the foregoing provisions of this clause) and such other activity is the predominant one. Explanation: For the purposes of this sub-clause, "agricultural operation" does not include any activity carried on in a plantation as defined in clause (f) of 11 2 of the Plantations Labour Act, 1951 (69 of 1951); or (2) hospitals or dispensaries ; or (3) educational, scientific, research or training institutions ; or (4) institutions owned or managed by organisations wholly or substantially engaged.....

Bombay Forward Contracts Control Act, 1947, (Maharashtra) Section 6

Title: Power of Recognised Association to Make, Add To, Vary or Rescind Bye

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1947

.....Association and non-member. The contract did not bear the signature of one of the parties to the contract. Consent of the person entering into a contract required by section 8(i)(b), (iii) could be oral as there was no bye-law which required that consent should be in writing. And such consent would be implicit in the very act of the parties entering into a contract where such contract is not challenged on the ground of its being induced by undue influence, fraud or any factor which would vitiate it. It was held that (a) though the contract notes were not signed by the defendants, it did not render them illegal or unenforceable; (b) also that the consent of the defendants was implicit in the very act of the defendants in entering into the contract.-Hirji Bhurmal v. Bombay Cotton Ltd., AIR 1957 Bom. 411 : I. L. R. 1957 Bom. 163 : (1957) 59 Bom. L. R. 4.