Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: lodgeSign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialThe Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Complete Act
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1947
.....THE BOMBAY RENTS, HOTEL AND LODGING HOUSE RATES CONTROL ACT, 1947 THE BOMBAY RENTS, HOTEL AND LODGING HOUSE RATES CONTROL ACT, 1947 [REPEALED ACT] [Act, No. 57 of 1947] (For Statement of Objects and Reasons, See Bombay Government Gazette, 1947, Part V, page 364.) [13th January 1948] PREAMBLE An Act to amend and consolidate the law relating to the control of rents andrepairs of certain premises, of rates of hotels and lodging houses and of evictions. WHEREAS it is expedient to amend and consolidate the law relating to the control of rents and repairs of certain premises, of rates of hotels and lodging house and of evictions ; It is hereby enacted as follows:- Section 1 - Short title This Act may be called the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. Section 2 - Extent (1) Parts I and IV of this Act shall extend to the1[Bombay area of the State of Maharashtra]. (2)2[Parts II and IIA shall extend to the areas specified in Schedule I and Part III shall extend to the areas specified in Schedule II] to this Act and shall continue to extend to any such area notwithstanding that the area ceases to be of the description therein specified. .....
List Judgments citing this sectionDelhi Rent Control Act, 1958 [Repealed] Chapter V
Title: Hotels and Lodging Houses
State: Central
Year: 1958
.....of this clause, "nuisance" shall be deemed to include anyact which constitutes an offence under the Suppression of Immoral Traffic inWomen and Girls Act, 1956 (104 of 1956); (b)that the accommodation is reasonably and bona fide required by the owner of thehotel or lodging house, as the case may be, either for his own occupation or forthe occupation of any person for whose benefit the accommodation is held, or anyother cause which may be deemed satisfactory to the Controller; (c)that the lodger has failed to vacate the accommodation on the termination of theperiod of the agreement in respect thereof; (d)that the lodger has done any act which is inconsistent with the purpose forwhich the accommodation was given to him or which is likely to affect adverselyor substantially- the owner's interest therein; (c)that the lodger has failed to pay the rent due from him.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionDelhi Rent Act, 1995 Chapter V
Title: Hotels and Lodging Houses
State: Central
Year: 1995
.....the purposes of this clause, "nuisance" shall be deemed to include any act which constitutes an offence under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956(104 of 1956); (b) that the accommodation is reasonably and bona fide required by the owner of the hotel or lodging house, as the case may be either for his own occupation or for the occupation of any person for whose benefit the accommodation is held or any other cause which may be deemed satisfactory to the Rent Authority; (c) that the lodger has failed to vacate the accommodation on the termination of the period of the agreement in respect thereof; (d) that the lodger has done any act which is inconsistent with the purpose for which the accommodation was given to him or which is likely to affect adversely or substantially the owner's interest therein; (e) that the lodger has failed to pay the rent due from him.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionDelhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 [Repealed] Chapter IV
Title: Hotels and Lodging Houses
State: Central
Year: 1952
.....for his own occupation or for the occupation of any person for whose benefit the accommodation is held, or any other cause which may be deemed satisfactory by the Controller; (c) that the lodger has failed to vacate the accommodation on the termination of the period of the agreement in respect thereof; (d) that the lodger has done any act which is inconsistent with the purpose for which the accommodation was given to him or which is likely to affect adversely or substantially the owner's interest therein; (e) that the lodger has failed to pay the rent due from him. Section 29 - Appeals (1) Any person aggrieved by the order of the Controller under this Chapter may, within fifteen days on which the order is communicated to him, prefer an appeal in writing to the Chief Commissioner. (2) The Chief commissioner shall call for the record of the Controller and after examining the record and after making such further inquiry as he thinks fit either personally or through the Controller, shall decide the appeal. (3) The decision of the Chief Commissioner and subject only to such decision, the order of the Controller shall, for the purposes of this Chapter, be final. .....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe Rajasthan Tax on Luxuries (in Hotels and Lodging Houses) Act, 1990 Complete Act
State: Rajasthan
Year: 1990
.....separately by the hotelier; (p) "registered hotelier" means a hotelier registered under this Act; (q) "rules" means the rules made under this Act; (r) "Sales Tax Act" means the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, [1994]; (s) "State" means the State of Rajasthan; (t) "Tax" means the tax payable under this Act; (u) "turnover" means the aggregate of the amounts of the monetary consideration received or receivable by a hotelier or by his agent in respect of the luxuries provided in a hotel during a given period; (v) "year" means the financial year which shall also be known as the assessment year. (2) All words and expression which are used but are not defined in this Act and are defined in the Sales Tax Act shall have the meanings assigned to them in that Act. 3. Incidence of taxation.- (1) There shall be levied a tax on the turnover of a hotelier and such tax shall be payable by him in accordance with the provisions of this Act. (Substituted by Raj. Act No. 9of 1997, w.e.f. 30.3.1997.) [(2) If a person other than the owner (including part-owner) is for the time being incharge of a hotel, then such person (excluding the manager or incharge of the hotel who is merely.....
List Judgments citing this sectionCode of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 148A
Title: Right to Lodge a Caveat
State: Central
Year: 1908
.....of the application on the caveator. (4) Where a notice of any caveat has been served on the applicant, he shall forthwith furnish the caveator at the caveator's expense, with a copy of the application made by him and also with copies of any paper or document which has been, or may be, filed by him in support of the application. (5) Where a caveat has been lodged under sub-section (1), such caveat shall not remain in force after the expiry of ninety days from the date on which it was lodged unless the application referred to in sub-section (1) has been made before the expiry of the said period.] _________________ 1. Inserted by Act 104 of 1976, section 50 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe Meghalaya Tax on Luxuries (Hotels & Lodging Houses) (Amendment) Act, 1991 Complete Act
State: Meghalaya
Year: 1991
THE MEGHALAYA TAX ON LUXURIES (HOTELS & LODGING HOUSES) (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1991 THE MEGHALAYA TAX ON LUXURIES (HOTELS & LODGING HOUSES) (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1991 An Act Further to amend the Meghalaya Tax on Luxuries( Hotels and Lodging Houses) Act 1991. Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Meghalaya in the Sixty-second Year of the Republic of India as follows :- Short title and commencement. 1. (1) The Act may be called the Meghalaya Tax on Luxuries Hotel and Lodging Houses) (Amendment) Act, 2011. (2) It shall come into force at once. Amendment of Section 3 2. In section 3 of the Meghalaya Tax on Luxuries(Hotels and Lodging Houses) Act, 1991, for clauses (a),(b),(c),(d),(e) and (f), the following new clauses (a),(b),(c), ),(d),(e) and (f), shall be substituted, namely:- "(a) is below Rs.200/- .5% (b) exceeds Rs.200/- but does not exceed Rs.500/- .......7% (c) exceeds Rs.500/- but does not exceed Rs.1000/- .8% (d) exceeds Rs 1000/- but does not exceed Rs.2500/- 10% (e) exceeds Rs.2500/- 20% Meghalaya State Acts
List Judgments citing this sectionThe Tripura Tax on Luxuries in Hotels and Lodging Houses Act, 1990 Complete Act
State: Tripura
Year: 1990
THE TRIPURA TAX ON LUXURIES IN HOTELS AND LODGING HOUSES ACT, 1990 THE TRIPURA TAX ON LUXURIES IN HOTELS AND LODGING HOUSES ACT, 1990 An Act To provide for the levy and collection of Tax on Luxuries provided in Hotels and lodging Houses. Be it enacted by the Legislative Assembly of the State of Tripura in the Fortyfirst year of the Republic of India as follows:- 1. Short title, extent and commencement - (1) This Act may be called the Tripura Tax on Luxuries in Hotels and Lodging Houses Act, 1990. (2) It extends to the whole of the state of Tripura. (3) It shall come into force on such date as the State Government may, by notification in the Tripura Gazette, appoint. 2. Definitions - In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,- (a) "appellate authority" means an appellate authority appointed under section 4 ; (b) "assessing authority" means an assessing authority appointed section 4 ; (c) "Commissioner" means the Commissioner appointed under section 4 : (d) "concessional rate" in relation to luxury provided in a hotel means a rate lower than the normal rate fixed for such luxury by the hotel or lower than that fixed by the Government or.....
List Judgments citing this sectionKarnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Section 308B
Title: Lodging of Account with the Returning Officer
State: Karnataka
Year: 1993
Section 308B - Lodging of account with the returning officer 1 [308B. Lodging of account with the returning officer.-- Every contesting candidate at the election to the Zilla Panchayat or Taluk Panchayat under this Act shall within thirty days from the date of election of the returned candidate or, if there are more than one returned candidate at the election and the dates of the election are different, the later of those two dates lodge with the Returning Officer appointed at an election under this Act an account of his election expenses which shall be a true copy of the account kept by him or by his election agent under section 308A.] ______________________ 1. 308A to 308D Inserted by Act 37 of 2003 w.e.f. 1.10.2003.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionKarnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Section 308C
Title: Failure to Lodge an Account of Election Expenses
State: Karnataka
Year: 1993
Section 308C - Failure to lodge an account of election expenses 1 [308C. Failure to lodge an account of election expenses.-- If the State Election Commission is satisfied that any person,- (a) has failed to lodge an account of election expenses within the time and in the manner required by or under this Act; and (b) has no good reason or justification for the failure; the State Election Commission shall by order published in the Official Gazette declare him to be disqualified and any such person shall be disqualified for a period of six years from the date of the order.] ______________________ 1. 308A to 308D Inserted by Act 37 of 2003 w.e.f. 1.10.2003.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial