Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: jettiness Year: 1908 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.006 seconds)Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialPorts Act, 1908 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1908
.....been preserved. The only clause which in any way alters the law at at present in force in clause 43(b). That clause corresponds to S. 43(b) of the Act, which enacts that the owner or master of a vessel must pay all expenses, required by S.228 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1854 to be borne by him, before the grant of a port-clearance. The Statute of 1854 has been repealed by the present Merchant Shipping Act, 1894 (57 and 58 Vict.. Cap. 60). Section 207 of which makes the owner or master liable to pay a further item of expense in addition to the items mentioned in the corresponding Section (228) of the repealed Statute. The substitution of Section 207 of the existing Statute for the reference to the repealed Statute makes the scope of clause 43(b) of the Bill slightly wider than that of the corresponding provision of the existing Act. This is, however, in accordance with the spirit of the existing enactment. The Act has been withdrawn from certain ports mentioned in the first schedule, while certain new ports have been brought under its operation. The schedule has been amended accordingly........"- Gaz. of Ind.. 1908, Part V. page 309.An Act to condolidate the enactments.....
List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Ports Act, 1908 Section 6
Title: Power to Make Port-rules
State: Central
Year: 1908
.....shall be construed to affect the validity of any rule in force immediately before the commencement of the Indian Ports Act, 1889, and continued by Section 2, Sub-section (2), of that Act. 12 [(2A) Every rule made by the State Government under this Act shall be laid as soon as may be after it is made, before the State Legislature. (2B) Every rule made by the Central Government under this Act shall be laid as House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session, or in two or more successive sessions and if before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid both the House agree any modification in the order or both Houses agree that the rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be, so however that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule.] (3) If any person disobeys any rule made under Clause (p) of Sub-section (1), he shall be punishable for every such offence with fine which may extend to one.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Ports Act, 1908 Section 4
Title: Power to Extend or Withdraw the Act or Certain Portions Thereof
State: Central
Year: 1908
.....in force; (b) specially extend the provisions of Section 31 or Section 32 to any port to which they have not been so extended; (c) withdraw this Act or Section 31 or Section 32 from any port or any part thereof in which it is for the time being in force. (2) A notification under Clause (a) or Clause (b) of Sub-section (1) shall define the limits of the area to which it refers. (3) Limits defined under Sub-section (2) may include any piers, jetties, landing-places, wharves, quays, docks and other works made on behalf of the public for convenience of traffic, for safety of vessels, or for the improvement, maintenance or good government of the port and its approaches, whether within or without high-water mark, and, subject to any rights of private property therein, any portion of the shore or bank within fifty yard of high water-mark. (4) "In Sub-section (3) the expression "high-water-mark" means the highest point reached or by ordinary spring tides at any season of the year. ______________________ 1. The words "with the previous sanction of the Governor-General in Council" were omitted by the Indian Ports (Amendment) Act, 1916 (6 of 1916), Section 2. 2. Substituted.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Ports Act, 1908 Chapter III
Title: Port-officials and their Powers and Duties
State: Central
Year: 1908
.....the deficiency be not paid within one month of such demand the conservator may recover the deficiency from such owner in the manner laid down in Sub-section (2) of Section 57 for recovery of expenses and damages or in any other manner according a the deficiency does not or does exceed one thousand rupees.] __________________________ 1. Inserted by Indian Ports (Amendment) Act (23 of 1992), Section 3 (12-8-1992). (55 of 1952). 2. Substituted for "under Sub-section (1)" by Act (23 of 1992), Section 3 (12-8-1992). 3. Substituted for the words "six months" by the Indian Ports (Amendment) Act 1952 (55 of 1952). Section 2 (9-8-1952). Words "two months" as substituted have now been substituted by words "thirty days" by Indian Ports (Amendment) Act (23 of 1992), Section 3 (12-8-1992). Section 15 - Power to board vessels and enter buildings (1) The Conservation or any of his assistants may, whenever he suspects that any offence against this Act has been or is about to be, committed, or whenever it is necessary for him so to do in the performance of any duty imposed upon him by this Act, and the person appointed under this Act to.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Ports Act, 1908 Section 10
Title: Removal of Obstructions Within Limits of Port
State: Central
Year: 1908
(1) The conservator may remove, or cause to be removed, any timber, raft or other thing flating or being in any part of any such port, which in his opinion obstructs or impedes the free navigation thereof or the lawful use of any pier, jetty, landing-place, wharf, quary, dock, mooring or other work on any part of the shore or bank which has been declared to be within the limits of the port and is not private property. (2) The owner of any such timer, raft or other thing shall be liable to pay the reasonable expenses of the removal thereof, and if such owner or any other person has without lawful excuse caused any such obstruction or impediment or causes any pubic nuisance affecting or likely to affect such free navigation or lawful use, he shall also be punishable with fine which may extend to one hundred rupees. (3) The conservator or any Magistrate having jurisdiction over the offence may cause any such nuisance to be abated.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial