Title : Confession to Police Officer Not to Be Proved
State : Central
Year : 1872
No confession made to a police officer1 , shall be proved as against a person accused of any offence. _____________________ 1. As to statements made to a police officer investigating a case, see the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), section 162. View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionTitle : How Much of Information Received from Accused May Be Proved
State : Central
Year : 1872
Provided that, when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved . View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionTitle : Confession Made After Removal of Impression Caused by Inducement, Threat or Promise Relevant
State : Central
Year : 1872
If such a confession as is referred to in section 24 is made after the impression caused by any such inducement, threat or promise has, in the opinion of the Court, been fully removed, it is relevant. View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionTitle : Confession Otherwise Relevant Not to Become Irrelevant Because of Promise of Secrecy, Etc
State : Central
Year : 1872
If such a confession is otherwise relevant, it docs not become irrelevant merely because it was made under a promise of secrecy, or in consequence of a deception practiced on the accused person for the purpose of obtaining it, or when he was drunk, or because it was made in answer to questions which he need not have answered, whatever may have been the form of those questions, or because he was not warned that he was not bound to make such confession, and that evidence of it might be given against him. View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionTitle : Admissions Not Conclusive Proof, but May Estop
State : Central
Year : 1872
Admissions are not conclusive proof of the matters admitted but they may operate as estoppels under the provisions hereinafter contained. View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionTitle : Relevancy of Certain Evidence for Proving, in Subsequent Proceeding, the Truth of Facts Therein Stated
State : Central
Year : 1872
Evidence given by a witness in a judicial proceeding or before any person authorized by law to take it, is relevant for the purpose of proving, in a subsequent judicial proceeding, or in a later stage of the same judicial proceeding, the truth of the facts which it states, when the witness is dead or cannot be found, or is incapable of giving evidence, or is kept out of the way by the adverse party, or if his presence cannot be obtained without an amount of delay or expense which, under the circumstances of the case, the Court considers unreasonable : Provided that the proceeding was between the same parties or their representatives in interest; that the adverse party in the first proceeding had the right and opportunity to cross-examine; that the questions in issue were..... View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionTitle : Relevancy of Statements in Maps, Charts and Plans
State : Central
Year : 1872
Statements of facts in issue or relevant facts, made in published maps or charts generally offered for public sale, or in maps or plans made under the authority of 1 [the Central Government or any State Government], as to matters usually represented or stated in such maps, charts or plans, are themselves relevant facts. _____________________ 1. Substituted by the A.O. 1948, for "any Government in British India." View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionTitle : Relevancy of Statements as to Any Law Contained in Law-books
State : Central
Year : 1872
When the Court has to form an opinion as to a law of any country, any statement of such law contained in a book purporting to be printed or published under the authority of the Government of such country and to contain any such law, and any report of a ruling of the Courts of such country contained in a book purporting to be a report of such rulings, is relevant. View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionTitle : Previous Judgments Relevant to Bar a Second Suit or Trial
State : Central
Year : 1872
The existence of any judgment, order or decree which by law prevents any Courts from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial is a relevant fact when the question is whether such Court ought to take cognizance of such suit or to hold such trial. View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionTitle : Relevancy and Effect of Judgments, Orders or Decrees, Other Than Those Mentioned in Section 41
State : Central
Year : 1872
Judgments, orders or decrees other than those mentioned in section 41, are relevant if they relate to matters of a public nature relevant to the enquiry, but such judgments, orders or decrees are not conclusive proof of that which they state. Illustration A sues B for trespass on his land. B alleges the existence of a public right of way over the land, which A denies. The existence of a decree in favour of the defendant, in a suit by A against C for a trespass on the same land in which C alleged the existence of the same right of way, is relevant, but it is not conclusive proof that the right of way exists. View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section