Bare Act Search Results

Cantonments Act, 1924 Section 236

Title: Penalty for Loitering and Importuning for Purposes of Prostitution

State: Central

Year: 1924

.....Naval] or Air Force Police, being employed in the cantonment and authorised in this behalf by the3[Officer Commanding the station], in whose presence the offence was committed, or of a police officer not below the rank of a sub-inspector4[or a sergeant] who is employed in the cantonment and authorised in this behalf by the3[Officer Commanding the station]4[with the concurrence of the District Magistrate]. ________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 15 of 1983, section 134, for "two hundred rupees" (w.e.f. 1-10-1983). 2. Inserted by Act 15 of 1983, section 134 (w.e.f. 1-10-1983). 3. Substituted by Act 7 of 1925, section 14, for "commanding Officer of the Cantonment". 4. Inserted by Act 7 of 1931, sec 7.

Cantonments Act, 2006 Section 300

Title: Penalty for Loitering and Importuning for Purposes of Prostitutionn

State: Central

Year: 2006

(1) Whoever in a cantonment loiters for the purpose of prostitution or importunes any person to the commission of sexual immorality, shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to three months, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees and in case of subsequent offence shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to one year. (2) No prosecution for an offence under this section shall be instituted except on the complaint of the person importuned, or of a military officer in whose presence the offence was committed, or of a member of the Military, Naval or Air Force Police, being employed in the cantonment and authorised in this behalf by the Officer Commanding the Station, in whose presence the offence was committed, or of a police officer not below the rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector, who is deployed in the cantonment and authorised in this behalf by the Officer Commanding the Station with the concurrence of District Magistrate.

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 61

Title: Will Obtained by Fraud, Coercion or Importunity

State: Central

Year: 1925

.....imprisonment. (iv) A threatens to shoot B, or to burn his house or to cause him to be arrested on a criminal charge, unless he makes a bequest in favour of C. B, in consequence, makes a bequest in favour of C. The bequest is void, the making of it having been caused by coercion. (v) A, being of sufficient intellect, if undisturbed by the influence of others, to make a will yet being so much under the control of B that he is not a free agent, makes a Will dictated by B. It appears that he would not have executed the will but for fear of B. The Will is invalid. (vi) A, being in so feeble a state of health as to be unable to resist importunity, is pressed by B to make a Will of a certain purport and does so merely to purchase peace and in submission to B. The Will is invalid. (vii) A being in such a state of health as to be capable of exercising his own judgment and volition, B uses urgent intercession and persuasion with him to induce him to make a Will of a certain purport. A, in consequence of the intercession and persuasion, but in the free exercise of his judgment and volition makes his Will in the manner recommended by B. The Will is not rendered invalid by the.....

Cantonments Act, 1924 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1924

.....administration of cantonments the spirit of the reformed scheme of Government, recommended a complete revision and an algamation of the Cantonments Act(Act 15 of 1910) and the Cantonment Code, 1912, in order to bring into conformity with ordinary municipal law the system under which military cantonments are administered. The recommendations of the committee have now been examined by the Government of India and the conclusions arrived at are embodied in the BiH. The main features of the Rill are as follows:- (a) It is proposed to lake power to municipalize the government of those cantonments which contain a substantial civil population having no essential connection with or dependence upon the military administration. In other cantonments where these circumstances do not fully exist the administration of contanment. Affairs will be vested in the hands of the commanding officer of the cantonment, who for the purpose of the Act, will be constituted a corporation sole. The general effect will be that the Government authority will cease to be the purely executive .agency as at present. In the larger cantonments the existing cantonment committee will be replaced by a cantonment Board.....

Cantonments Act, 2006 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 2006

.....of whatever grade in immediate executive engineering charge of a cantonment; (t) "factory" means a factory as defined in clause (m) of (S.2 of the Factories Act, 1948) (63 of 1948); (u) "Forces" means the regular Army, Navy and Air Force or any part of any one or more of them; (v) "General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, the Command" (GOC-in-C, Command) means the Officer Commanding any of the Commands; (w) "General Officer Commanding the Area" means the Officer Commanding any one of the areas into which India is for military purposes for the time being divided, or any sub-area which does not form part of any such area, or any area which the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare to be an area for all or any of the purposes of this Act; (x) "Group Housing" means a group of houses for dwelling purposes and may comprise all or any of the following: namely, (a) a dwelling unit, (b) open spaces intended for recreation and ventilation, (c) roads, paths, sewers, drains, water supply and ancillary installations, street lighting and other amenities, (d) convenient shopping place, schools, community hall or other amenities for common use; (y).....

Cantonments Act, 1924 Chapter XIV

Title: Removal and Exclusion from Cantonments and Suppression of Sexual Immorality

State: Central

Year: 1924

.....in the order. ________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 7 of 1925, section 10, for "Commanding Officer of a cantonment". 2. Inserted by Act 2 of 1954, section 20. 3. Substituted by Act 7 of 1925, section 14, for "Commanding Officer of the Cantonment". 4. Substituted by Act 2 of 1954, section 20, for "he may". Section 236 - Penalty for loitering and importuning for purposes of prostitution (1) Whoever in a cantonment loiters for the purpose of prostitution or importunes any person to the commission of sexual immorality, shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to1[five hundred rupees]. (2) No prosecution for an offence under this section shall be instituted except on the complaint of the person importuned, or of a military officer in whose presence the offence was committed, or of a member of the Military2[, Naval] or Air Force Police, being employed in the cantonment and authorised in this behalf by the3[Officer Commanding the station], in whose presence the offence was committed, or of a police officer not below the rank of a sub-inspector4[or a sergeant] who is employed in the cantonment and.....

Cantonments Act, 2006 Chapter XIV

Title: Removal and Exclusion from Cantonments and Suppression of Sexual Immorality

State: Central

Year: 2006

.....the owner, lessee, tenant or occupier, as the case may be, to discontinue such use of the building within such period as may be specified in the order. Section 300 - Penalty for loitering and importuning for purposes of prostitutionn (1) Whoever in a cantonment loiters for the purpose of prostitution or importunes any person to the commission of sexual immorality, shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to three months, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees and in case of subsequent offence shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to one year. (2) No prosecution for an offence under this section shall be instituted except on the complaint of the person importuned, or of a military officer in whose presence the offence was committed, or of a member of the Military, Naval or Air Force Police, being employed in the cantonment and authorised in this behalf by the Officer Commanding the Station, in whose presence the offence was committed, or of a police officer not below the rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector, who is deployed in the cantonment and authorised in this behalf by the Officer Commanding the Station with the concurrence.....

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Part 6

Title: Testamentary Succession

State: Central

Year: 1925

.....of ministers of religion; for the formation or support of a public garden; All these bequests are void. _____________________ 1. Added by Act 51 of 1991, section 6. INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925Chapter 8 - OF THE VESTING OF LEGACIES Section 119 - Date of vesting of legacy when payment or possession postponed Where by the terms of a bequest the legatee is not entitled to immediate possession of the thing bequeathed, a right to receive it at the proper time shall, unless a contrary intention appears by the will, become vested in the legatee on the testator's death, and shall pass to the legatee's representatives if he dies before that time and without having received the legacy, and in such cases the legacy is from the testator's death said to be vested in interest. Explanation.An intention that a legacy to any person shall not become vested in interest in him is not to be inferred merely from a provision whereby the payment or possession of the thing bequeathed is postponed, or whereby a prior interest therein is bequeathed to some other person, or whereby the income arising from the fund bequeathed is directed to be accumulated until the time of payment arrives,.....

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Chapter 2

Title: Of Wills and Codicils

State: Central

Year: 1925

.....imprisonment. (iv) A threatens to shoot B, or to burn his house or to cause him to be arrested on a criminal charge, unless he makes a bequest in favour of C. B, in consequence, makes a bequest in favour of C. The bequest is void, the making of it having been caused by coercion. (v) A, being of sufficient intellect, if undisturbed by the influence of others, to make a will yet being so much under the control of B that he is not a free agent, makes a Will dictated by B. It appears that he would not have executed the will but for fear of B. The Will is invalid. (vi) A, being in so feeble a state of health as to be unable to resist importunity, is pressed by B to make a Will of a certain purport and does so merely to purchase peace and in submission to B. The Will is invalid. (vii) A being in such a state of health as to be capable of exercising his own judgment and volition, B uses urgent intercession and persuasion with him to induce him to make a Will of a certain purport. A, in consequence of the intercession and persuasion, but in the free exercise of his judgment and volition makes his Will in the manner recommended by B. The Will is not rendered invalid by the.....

Karnataka Police Act, 1963 Chapter VIII

Title: Offences and Punishments

State: Karnataka

Year: 1963

.....which there is reason to believe is stolen property, or property fraudulently obtained, shall, if he fails to account for such possession or act to the satisfaction of the Magistrate, on conviction, be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months or with fine which may extend to one hundred rupees or with both. Section 99 - Omission by pawnbroker, etc., to report to the Police the possession or tender of property suspected to be stolen Whoever being a pawnbroker, dealer in second hand property, or worker in metals or reasonably believed by the Commissioner or the Superintendent in the area under their respective charges to be such a person, and having received from a Police Officer a written or printed information that the possession of any property suspected to have been transferred by any offence mentioned in section 410 of the Indian Penal Code or by any offence punishable under sections 417, 418, 419 or 420 of the said Code, is found in possession or thereafter comes into the possession or has an offer either by way of sale, pawn, exchange or for custody, alteration or otherwise, howsoever made to him of property answering the description.....