Bare Act Search Results

Navy Act, 1957 Section 36

Title: Delaying or Discouraging Action or Service Commanded

State: Central

Year: 1957

Every person subject to naval law who wilfully delays or discourages upon any pretext whatsoever, any action or service which has been commanded on the part of the Navy, regular Army, or Air Force or of any forces cooperating therewith shall,-- (a) if such act is committed with intent to assist the enemy, be punished with death or such other punishment as is hereinafter mentioned; and (b) in any other case, be punished with imprisonment which may extend to seven years or such other punishment as is hereinafter mentioned.

Navy Act, 1957 Chapter VIII

Title: Articles of War

State: Central

Year: 1957

..... Section 42 - Mutiny defined 1[42. Mutiny defined Mutiny means any assembly or combination of two or more persons subject to naval law, the Army Act, 1950, or the Air Force Act, 1950, or between persons two at least of whom are subject to naval law or any such Act,-- (a) to overthrow or resist lawful authority in the Navy, regular Army or Air Force or any part of any one or more of them or any forces co-operating therewith or any part thereof; or (b) to disobey such authority in such circumstances as to make the disobedience subversive of discipline or with the object of avoiding any duty or service against, or in connection with operations against, the enemy; or (c) to show contempt to such authority in such circumstances as to make such conduct subversive of discipline; or (d) to impede the performance of any duty or service in the Navy, regular Army or Air Force or any part of any one or more of them or any forces co-operating therewith or any part thereof.] ________________________ 1. Substituted by the Navy (Amdt.) Act, 1974 (53 of 1974), Section 9 (16-12-1974). Section 43 - Punishment for mutiny Everyperson subject to naval law, who,-- (a)joins in a.....

Navy Act, 1957 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1957

.....to the Indian Naval Forces. When the constitutional changes took place, action was taken to adapt this Act and it now appears as a self-contained Act. 2. This Act dealt largely with disciplinary provisions. There were no statutory provisions concerning the various matters of administration, enrolment, grant of commissions etc. 3. It was long considered that this lacuna should be filled and when the constitutional changes took place it became evident that it would be necessary to have a consolidating statute on the subject. In the meantime, in 1950, the revised Army Act and Air Force Act were passed by Parliament. It was not possible at that time to draft a revised Navy Bill as the present Act was modelled mainly on the corresponding British Act. In U.K., a special committee had been appointed to examine the question of the revision of the British Naval Code. It was thought that it would be an advantage to await the report of that Committee. The present draft has been made taking into account the report of that Committee. 4. In drawing up the present Bill, the provisions of the Army and Air Force Acts have been borne in mind, but changes have had to be accepted on account of.....

The Eradiction of Unfair Activities at Pandharpur Temples (for Providing Better Facilities for Worship) Act, 1980 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1980

.....FACILITIES FOR WORSHIP) ACT, 1980 THE ERADICTION OF UNFAIR ACTIVITIES AT PANDHARPUR TEMPLES (FOR PROVIDING BETTER FACILITIES FOR WORSHIP) ACT, 1980 ACT No. X OF 1980 This Act received the President's assent on the 19th July, 1980; the assent was first published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette on the 19th July 1980. An Act to eradicate certain unfair activities at Pandharpur Temples in Maharashtra WHEREAS, complaints were received by the State Government regarding mismanagement of Pandharpur Temples in Sholapur District, and the Pandharpur Temples Act, 1973, was, therefore, enacted; inter-alia for acquisition of the hereditary rights and privileges of ministrarits and priestly classes functioning in the Pandharpur Temples and to provide for better administration and governance of these Temples AND WHEREAS, in view of continuous litigation by the interested parties. it has not been possible to bring the provisions of the Act into force, except sections 1 (2), 21 to 31, 33, 34, 38 and 39 thereof AND WHEREAS, it appears that it will take some years to get a final decision of the Court in this matter, where the validity of the Act itself has also been challenged AND.....

Eradication of Unfair Activities at Pandharpur Temples (for Providing Better Facilities for Worship) Act, 1980 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1980

.....of these Temples; AND WHEREAS in view of continuous litigation by the interested parties, it has not been possible to bring the provisions of the Act into force, except sections 1(2), 21 to 31, 33, 34, 38 and 39 thereof; AND WHEREAS it appears that it will take some years to get a final decision of the Court in this matter, where the validity of the Act itself has also been challenged; AND WHEREAS, complaints have been received by Government from a large number of devotees of God Vithoba and Goddess Rukmini visiting the Pandharpur Temples that they are being exploited by the priests at the Temples by demanding unreasonable dakshinas, offerings, donations, gifts, fees or other charges for allowing them to enter the Temples for worshipping or for performing any religious service or ceremonies therein and on failure to meet the demands of the priests the devotees are being insulted, abused or cursed and even molested physically; AND WHEREAS, on account of the aforementioned activities of the priests, there has been great unrest and discontent amongst the millions of devotees visiting the Pandharpur Temples. AND WHEREAS, for these reasons, it is expedient to eradicate the.....

The Bombay Hindu Places of Public Worship (Entry Authorization) Act, 1956 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1956

THE BOMBAY HINDU PLACES OF PUBLIC WORSHIP (ENTRY AUTHORIZATION) ACT, 1956 THE BOMBAY HINDU PLACES OF PUBLIC WORSHIP (ENTRY AUTHORIZATION) ACT, 1956 (Bom. Act No. XXXI of 1956) ( For Statement of Objects and Reasons, See Bombay Government Gazette, Extraordinary 1956 Part V, Page.191.) [28th May 1958] An Act to make better provision for the throwing open of places of public worship to all classes and sections of Hindus WHEREAS it is expedient to make better provision for the throwing open of places of public worship to all classes and Sections of Hindus; It is hereby enacted in the Seventh Year of the Republic of India as follows :- 1. Short title, extent and commencement.- (1) This Act may be called the Bombay Hindu Places of Public Worship (Entry Authorization) Act, 1956. (This sub-section was substituted by Bom. 36 of 1958, s.3(a)) [(2) It extends to the whole of the State of Bombay.] 1. (3) It shall come into force (These words were inserted, ibid., s.3(b)) [in the pre-Re-organisation State of Bombay] on such date as the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, (These words were substituted for the word "appoint", ibid., s.3(b)).....

Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 Chapter 6

Title: Control of Certain Restrictive Trade Practices

State: Central

Year: 1969

.....to the Central Government 2[***] for such action as that Government may take under section 31. ________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 30 of 1984, section 31 for "a monopolistic undertaking is indulging in restrictive trade practices" w.e.f. 1-8-1984. 2. The words "with regard to any monopolistic trade practice" omitted by Act 30 of 1984, section 31 w.e.f. 1-8-1984. Section 38 - Presumption as to the public interest (1) For the purposes of any proceedings before the Commission under section 37, a restrictive trade practice shall be deemed to be prejudicial to the public interest unless the Commission is satisfied of any one or more of the following circumstances, that is to say- (a) that the restriction is reasonably necessary having regard to the character of the goods to which it applies, to protect the public against injury (whether to persons or to premises) in connection with the consumption, installation or use of those goods; (b) that the removal of the restriction would deny to the public as purchasers, consumers or users of any goods, other specific and substantial benefits or advantages enjoyed or likely to be enjoyed by them as such, whether.....

Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 Section 38

Title: Presumption as to the Public Interest

State: Central

Year: 1969

.....to become engaged in the trade or business of selling such goods or of producing or selling similar goods) resulting or likely to result from the operation of the restriction. (2) In this section "purchases", "consumers" and "users" include persons purchasing, consuming or using for the purpose or in course of trade or business or for public purposes; and references in this section to any one person include references to any two or more persons being inter-connected undertakings or individuals carrying on business in partnership with each other. ________________________ 1. The word "or" omitted by Act 30 of 1984, section 32 w.e.f. 1-8-1984. 2. Inserted by Act 30 of 1984, section 32 w.e.f. 1-8-1984.

Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Chapter IV

Title: Special Responsibilities as to Food Safety

State: Central

Year: 2006

.....person shall commence or carry on any food business except under a licence. (2) Nothing contained in sub-section (1) shall apply to a petty manufacturer who himself manufactures or sells any article of food or a petty retailer, hawker, itinerant vendor or a temporary stall holder or small scale or cottage or such other industries relating to food business or tiny food business operator; but they shall register themselves with such authority and in such manner as may be specified by regulations, without prejudice to the availability of safe and wholesome food for human consumption or affecting the interests of the consumers. (3) Any person desirous to commence or carry on any food business shall make an application for grant of a licence to the Designated Officer in such manner containing such particulars and fees as may be specified by regulations. (4) The Designated Officer on receipt of an application under sub-section (3), may either grant the licence or after giving the applicant an opportunity of being heard and for reasons to be recorded in writing, refuse to grant a licence to any applicant, if he is satisfied that it is necessary so to do in the interest of public.....

Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Section 28

Title: Food Recall Procedures

State: Central

Year: 2006

(1) If a food business operator considers or has reasons to believe that a food which he has processed, manufactured or distributed is not in compliance with this Act, or the rules or regulations, made thereunder, he shall immediately initiate procedures to withdraw the food in question from the market and consumers indicating reasons for its withdrawal and inform the competent authorities thereof. (2) A food business operator shall immediately inform the competent authorities and co-operate with them, if he considers or has reasons to believe that a food which he has placed on the market may be unsafe for the consumers. (3) The food business operator shall inform the competent authorities of the action taken to prevent risks to the consumer and shall not prevent or discourage any person from co-operating, in accordance with this Act, with the competent authorities, where this may prevent, reduce or eliminate a risk arising from a food. (4) Every food business operator shall follow such conditions and guidelines relating to food recall procedures as the Food Authority may specify by regulations.