The Suits Valuation Act, 1887 Complete Act - Bare Act

[For Statement of Objects and Reasons, see Gazette of India, 1886, Part V, page791; for Report of the Select Committee, see Gazette of India, 1887, Part IV, page 18; and for Proceedings in Council, see Gazette of India, 1886, supplement, pages 1131 and 1155, and Gazette of India, 1887, Part VI, pages 16 and 21.

This Act has been amended in the Punjab by Punjab Acts 1 of 1938 and 13 of 1942 and in the U.P. by U.P. Act 7 of 1939 and in Maharashtra by Maharashtra Act 4 of 1960 and repealed in Madras by Madras Act 14 of 1955, in Andhra by Andhra Act 7 of 1956, in Rajasthan by Rajasthan Act 3 of 1958, in its application to Bellary District by Mysore Act 14 of 1955, and in its application to Bombay Area and Coorg District of Mysore by Mysore Act 16 of 1958.

This Act has been extended to the whole of Madhya Pradesh by the Madhya Pradesh Act 23 of 1958.]

[11^th February, 1887]

An Act to prescribe the mode of valuing certain suits for the purpose of determining the jurisdiction of Courts with respect thereto.

WHEREAS it is expedient to prescribe the mode of valuing certain suits for the purpose of determining the jurisdiction of Courts with respect thereto; it is hereby enacted as follows:--

This Act may be called the Suits Valuation Act, 1887 [Added by the Adaptation of Laws (No. 2) Order, 1956.] [and it extends to the whole of India except the territories which, immediately before the 1st November, 1956, were comprised in Part B States].

This Part shall extend to such local areas, and come into force therein on such dates, as the [Substituted, by the Madhya Pradesh Act 23 of 1958 for "Government of a Part A State or a Part C State".] [State Government], by notification in the Official Gazette directs.[ Part I of the Act has, under section 2, been declared to extend to the Punjab and to come into force therein on the 1st day of March, 1889, see Gazette of India, 1889, Part I, Page 107.

This Act has been extended to Manipur by Act 68 of 1956 as amending Act 30 of 1950 w.e.f. 1.1.1957.]

(1) The State Government may [The words "subject to the control of the Governor General in Council" omitted by Government of India (Adaptation of Indian Laws) Order, 1937.

This Act has been extended to the Union Territory of Pondicherry by Act 26 of 1968, section 3 and Schedule.] [xxx] make rules for determining the value of land for purposes of jurisdiction in the suits mentioned in [Substituted by Himachal Pradesh Act 30 of 1969, Section 2 (w e f 2.06.1970).] [Himachal Pradesh Court-fees Act, 1968], section 7, paragraphs v and vi and paragraph x, clause (d).

(2) The rules may determine the value of any class of land, or of any interest in land, in the whole or any part of a local area, and may prescribe different values for different places within the same local area.

Where a suit mentioned in [Substituted by Himachal Pradesh Act 30 of 1969, Section 2 (w.e. f. 2.6.1970)] [the Himachal Pradesh Court-fees Act,1968, section 7, paragraph (iv) or Schedule II, Article 13 0r 18] relates to land or an interest in land of which the value has been determined by rules under the last foregoing section, the amount at which for purposes of jurisdiction the relief sought in the suit is valued shall not exceed the value of the land or interest as determined by those rules.

(1) The State Government shall, before making rules under section 3, consult the High Court with respect thereto.

(2) A rule under that section shall not take effect till the expiration of one month after the rule has been published in the Official Gazette.

On and from the date on which rules under section 3 take effect in any part of the territories under the administration of the Governor of Fort Saint George in Council to which the Madras Civil Courts Act, 1873 (3 of 1873) extends, section 14 of that Act shall be repealed as regards that part of those territories.

On and from the date on which rules under section 3 take effect in any part of the territories under the administration of the Governor of Fort Saint George in Council to which the Madras Civil Courts Act, 1873 (3 of 1873) extends, section 14 of that Act shall be repealed as regards that part of those territories.

This Part [The words " extends to the whole of India except Part B States, and " omitted by Adaptation of Laws (No. 2) Order, 1956.] [xxx] shall come into force on the 1st day of July, 1887.

Where in suits other than those referred to in [Substituted by Himachal Pradesh Act 30 of 1969, Section 2 (w.e.f. 6.2.1970)] [the Himachal Pradesh Court-fees Act, 1968]the Court-fees Act, 1870 (7 of 1870), section 7, paragraphs v, vi and ix, and paragraph x, clause (d), court-fees are payable ad valorem under the Court-fees Act, 1870, the value as determinable for the computation of court-fees and the value for purposes of jurisdiction shall be the same.

9. [In Section 9, for the words "the Court Fees Act, 1870", wherever occurring , substitute "the Himachal Pradesh Court-fees Act,1968" vide Himachal Pradesh Act 30 of 1969, Section 2 (w.e.f. 6.2.1970).] Determination of value of certain suits by High Court

When the subject-matter of suits of any class, other than suits mentioned in the Court-fees Act, 1870 (7 of 1870), section 7, paragraphs v and vi, and paragraph x, clause (d) is such that in the opinion of the High Court it does not admit of being satisfactorily valued, the High Court may with the previous sanction of the State Government, direct that suits of that class shall, for the purposes of the Court-fees Act, 1870, and of this Act and any other enactment for the time being in force, be treated as if their subject-matter were of such value as the High Court thinks fit to specify in this behalf.

Repealed by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1891 (12 of 1891), section 2 and Schedule I, Part I.

Repealed by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1891 (12 of 1891), section 2 and Schedule I, Part I.

(1) Notwithstanding anything in section 578 of the [Now section 99 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908).] Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882) and objection that by reason of the over-valuation or under-valuation of a suit or appeal a Court of first instance or lower Appellate Court which had no jurisdiction with respect to the suit or appeal exercise jurisdiction with respect thereto shall not be entertained by an Appellate court unless--

(a) the objection was taken in the Court of first instance at or before the hearing at which issues were first framed and recorded, or in the lower Appellate Court in memorandum of appeal to that Court, or

(b) the Appellate Court is satisfied, for reasons to be recorded by it in writing, that the suit or appeal was over-valued or under-valued, and that the over-valuation or under-valuation thereof has prejudicially affected the disposal of the suit or appeal on its merits.

[Inserted by Himachal Pradesh Act 30 of 1969, Section 4 (w e f 06.02.1970).] [Provided that in a suit for accounts, the value for the purposes of jurisdiction as determined by the Court at any stage of the trial shall be final and conclusive and shall not be liable to be contested in appeal or revision.]

(2) If the objection was taken in the manner mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (1), but the Appellate Court is not satisfied as to both the matters mentioned in clause (b) of that sub-section and has before it the materials necessary for the determination of the other grounds of appeal to itself, it shall dispose of the appeals as if there had been no defect of jurisdiction in the Court of first instance or lower Appellate Court.

(3) If the objection was taken in that manner and the Appellate Court is satisfied as to both those matters and has not those materials before, it, it shall proceed to deal with the appeal under the rules applicable to the Court with respect to the hearing of appeals; but if it remands the suits or appeal, or frames and refers issues for trial, or requires additional evidence to be taken, it shall direct its order to a Court competent to entertain the suit or appeal.

(4) The provisions of the section with respect to an Appellate Court shall, so far as they can be made applicable, apply to a Court exercising revisional jurisdiction under section 622 of the [Now section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908).] Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882) or other enactment for the time being in force.

(5) This section [The words "extends to the whole of India except Part B States and "omitted by the Adaptation of Laws (No. 2) Order, 1956.] [xxx] shall come into force on the first day of July, 1887.

Nothing in Part I or Part II shall be construed to affect the jurisdiction of any Court--

(a) with respect to any suit instituted before rules under Part I applicable to the valuation of the suit take effect, or Part II has come into force; as the case may be, or

(b) with respect to any appeal arising out of any such suit.