Skip to content


Smt. Ram Pyari Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
SubjectConstitution;Civil
CourtRajasthan High Court
Decided On
Case NumberWrit Petn. No. 1564 of 1985
Judge
Reported inAIR1988Raj124
ActsConstitution of India - Article 226
AppellantSmt. Ram Pyari
RespondentUnion of India (Uoi) and ors.
Appellant Advocate Jagdeep Dhankar, Adv.
Respondent Advocate B.P. Gupta, Adv. and; S.B. Mathur, Govt. Adv.
DispositionPetition allowed
Excerpt:
- - we may clarify that she is entitled to medical facilities and pension from the state government as well as additional pension from the central government according to freedom fighter's pension scheme, 1972 and swatantra sainik samman scheme, 1980 and indian national army pension scheme. 13. we are happy to place on record out deep sense of appreciation for the valuable assistance provided by dr. taknet, assistant professor, business administration, university of rajasthan, jaipur, who on account of his excellent zeal for service to the poor widows and down-trodden, had collected all this material by making serious consistent efforts and working for quite few years......confrontation of indian national army with the british army fighters and in action havildar major birad singh laid down his life in 1944. however, the respondents' case is that according to their register of casualties of indian army, he died on nov. 1, 1948 in far east. mr. gupta further pointed out that birad singh was a personnel of the indian army and not indian national army and his wife has been allowed family pension. in para. 5 clause (b) the following payments are alleged to be made to the widow--(i) deferred pay rs. 501/14 for the period from 4-1-1930 to 31-7-1946.(ii) war gratuity rs. 207/8 for the period from 3-9-1939 to 15-8-1946.(iii) final settlement of account rs. 1968/9 paid to her son ganpat sing nominated to estate.(iv) special family allowance from 1-11-46 to.....
Judgment:

G.M. Lodha, Actg. C.J.

1. 'Patrika', a prestigious daily news paper of Rajasthan, carried an important story on Sept. 10, 1985 under the caption 'Sainik ki patni 40 sal se pension ke liye bhatak rahi hai'. The story attracted the attention of one of us and as it was a case of denial of pension to a widow of . alleged Indian National Army Hawaldar, who laid down his life for the motherland in Azad Hind Fauz of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose for fighting the British Government, notice was taken by the Court on paper news only and it was treated as writ petition. Notices were issued to the various connected and concerned departments. The tragic tale and woeful story narrated by Smt. Rampyari relates back to the days when Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose formed the Azad Hind Fauz known as Indian National Army to obtain freedom of India by fighting British Government before independence in forties.

2. In Burma there was confrontation of Indian National Army with the British Army fighters and in action Havildar Major Birad Singh laid down his life in 1944. However, the respondents' case is that according to their register of casualties of Indian Army, he died on Nov. 1, 1948 in Far East. Mr. Gupta further pointed out that Birad Singh was a personnel of the Indian Army and not Indian National Army and his wife has been allowed family pension. In para. 5 Clause (b) the following payments are alleged to be made to the widow--

(i) Deferred pay Rs. 501/14 for the period from 4-1-1930 to 31-7-1946.

(ii) War gratuity Rs. 207/8 for the period from 3-9-1939 to 15-8-1946.

(iii) Final settlement of account Rs. 1968/9 paid to her son Ganpat Sing nominated to estate.

(iv) Special Family Allowance from 1-11-46 to 31-12-49.

(v) Family Pension @ Rs. 8/ per month w.e.f. 1-1-50. (She is also entitled to periodical increases sanctioned by the Government from time to time. Her present entitlement is Rs. 173.00 per month inclusive all increases).

(vi) Children allowance to three children @ Rs. 2/- per month to each child.

(vii) Ex-gratia award of death gratuity plus MO Commission Rs. 50.10 annas.

It is, however, contested that since she is claiming the pension as a member of the IndianNational Army, that cannot be allowed without proof.

3. We have considered the submissions of Mr. Gupta Before us today photo stat copies have been produced and original record has also been shown on behalf of the widow of Birad Singh. According to this record there is a certificate of the All India I.N.A. Committee, 82, Daryaganj, Delhi, which is dt. Nov. 11, 1985 mentioning that Birad Singh was a member of Indian National Army and is a political sufferer and is entitled to all the concessions allowed to other political sufferers vide Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs letter No. 4/6/61-Ests. (C), dt. May 23, 1961, His particulars have been mentioned in which it has been shown that his rank was Havildar and he was in the Unit 7/6 Rajasthan Rifles earlier. The village is Banura of Sikar district, Tehsil Danta Ramgarh. In this very record there is yet another important document which clinches the issue and that is a recital in the Congress Centenanry Celebration where Birad Singh's photo was placed and the following citation was mentioned : --

foM+nflg% vktkn fgUn QkStesa izFke jktLFkkuh jktiwrkuk jkbQYl ds pqfuUnk tokuks es ls 'ks[kkokVh dsfcM+nflg ,d Fks tks lu~ 1942 esa vktkn fgUn QkSt ds xBu ds lkFk gh] mlses 'kkfeygq;s A Hkkjr eka dh csfM;ka dkVus dk mUgsa ;g cgqr vPNk volj feyk Fkk A og ns'kdks LorU= djkus ds fy;s n`< fu'p;h Fks A mudh Hkkouk mu n~okjk jfpr buiafDr;ks es izdV gksrh gS tks og vius lkfFk;ks dks lquk;k djrs Fks%

gesnq[kks dks vc Hkwyk tkuk iMsxk A

oru ds fy,nq[k% mBkuk iMsxk AA

, vktknfgfn;s mBks] dej cka/kks A

oru yqVjgk gS] cpkuk iMsxk AA

gqDeusrkth dk ctkuk iMsxk A

oekZ ds iseuk ekspsZ ij vaxztksa ds fo:) y


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //