Skip to content


Nagendra Rao Vs. Indian Bank - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
SubjectService
CourtKarnataka High Court
Decided On
Case NumberW.P. No. 6353 of 1984
Judge
Reported inILR1995KAR3599; 1995(5)KarLJ332
ActsIndian-Bank Officer/Employee's Regulations, 1976 - Regulation 7
AppellantNagendra Rao
RespondentIndian Bank
Appellant AdvocateS. Vijayashankar, Senior Counsel and ;P.S. Rajagopal, Adv.
Respondent AdvocateK.P. Kumar, Adv.
DispositionWrit petition dismissed
Excerpt:
.....only.; (b) domestic enquiries : order of appellate authority - obligation to record reasons ; the obligation to record reasons applies more vigorously to authorities whose orders are subject to appeal or revision before a higher authority. in such cases the requirement of recording reasons, not only ensures proper consideration by the authorities concerned of the relevant facts but also introduces clarity in the decision and minimises the chances of arbitrariness in the making of the said decision. since any such order is appealable before a higher authority, the recording of reasons becomes necessary even to enable the appellate authority to appreciate the process of reasoning by which the lower authority has arrived at its conclusions. the obligation to give.....order of appellate authority - obligation to record reasons the obligation to record reasons applies more vigorously to authorities whose orders are subject to appeal or revision before a higher authority. in such cases the requirement of recording reasons, not only ensures proper consideration by the authorities concerned of the relevant facts but also introduces clarity in the decision and minimises the chances of arbitrariness in the making of the said decision. since any such order is appealable before a higher authority, the recording of reasons becomes necessary even to enable the appellate authority to appreciate the process of reasoning by which the lower authority has arrived at its conclusions. the obligation to give reasons however, may be dispensed with by the provisions of a.....
Judgment:
ORDER

OF APPELLATE AUTHORITY - Obligation to record reasons

The obligation to record reasons applies more vigorously to authorities whose orders are subject to appeal or revision before a higher authority. In such cases the requirement of recording reasons, not only ensures proper consideration by the authorities concerned of the relevant facts but also introduces clarity in the decision and minimises the chances of arbitrariness in the making of the said decision. Since any such order is appealable before a higher authority, the recording of reasons becomes necessary even to enable the Appellate Authority to appreciate the process of reasoning by which the lower Authority has arrived at its conclusions. The obligation to give reasons however, may be dispensed with by the provisions of a statute or the Rules either expressly or by necessary implication. If it is so excluded the obligation to record reasons disappears, as in the case of Court Martials exercising their jurisdiction under the provisions of the Army Act and the Rules framed thereunder. The obligation to record reasons disappears even in cases where the Appellate Authority passes an order of affirmances in which event it is not necessary for the Appellate Authority to marshal the evidence and record independent conclusions or reasons for the same. Where however the Appellate Authority reverses the findings recorded, it must disclose the reasons for doing so and demonstrate that the reversal is based on proper application of mind. The reasons recorded required to be recorded by an authority dealing with the matter need not be elaborate as is usually customary in the judgments delivered by the ordinary Courts. It is enough if what is recorded indicates due and proper application of mind to a matter in controversy.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //