Sheela Devi Vs. Jaspal Singh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/666096
SubjectCivil
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided OnJul-13-1998
Case NumberCivil Appeal No. 3236 of 1998 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 17936 of 1997)
JudgeSujata V. Manohar and; G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.
Reported inAIR1999SC2859; (1999)1SCC209
ActsUttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 18
AppellantSheela Devi
RespondentJaspal Singh
Excerpt:
civil - remedy - section 18 of uttar pradesh urban buildings (regulation of letting, rent and eviction) act, 1972 - respondent filed writ petition before high court - high court re-examined facts - no reason given by respondent for not availing remedy of revision under section 18 - impugned order of high court set aside. - order1. leave granted.2. no reason has been given by the respondent for not availing of the remedy of revision under section 18 of the u.p. urban buildings (regulation of letting, rent and eviction) act, 1972. the respondent straightway filed a writ petition before the high court where the high court had re-examined the facts. the impugnedorder of the high court is set aside. the respondent will be at liberty to avail of the alternate remedy of revision, if he so desires.3. the appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Judgment:
ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. No reason has been given by the respondent for not availing of the remedy of revision under Section 18 of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. The respondent straightway filed a writ petition before the High Court where the High Court had re-examined the facts. The impugnedorder of the High Court is set aside. The respondent will be at liberty to avail of the alternate remedy of revision, if he so desires.

3. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.