Naresh Paswan Vs. the State of Bihar Through the - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/975405
SubjectEducation
CourtPatna High Court
Decided OnMay-19-2012
AppellantNaresh Paswan
RespondentThe State of Bihar Through the
Excerpt:
in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.37496 of 2011 ====================================================== naresh paswan, son of late dhibu paswan, resident of village tekari, p.s. rajaun, district banka; presently residing at chitkohra basti; by the side of masjid, p.s. gardanibagh, district patna. .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar through the vigilance .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice rakesh kumar oral order (per: honourable mr. justice rakesh kumar”19. 01-2012 on call, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. in this case was passed over on 17.1.2012. again yesterday, it was passed over on the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. today, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. shri rama kant sharma, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party i.e. vigilance investigation bureau is present. the present petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure has been filed for quashing of an order dated 12.9.2011 passed in special case no.36 of patna high court cr.misc. no.37496 of 2011 (3) dt.19-01-201”2008. (arising out of vigilance p.s. case no.48 of 2008). by the said order, the learned special judge has rejected the petition filed for discharge. shri rama kant sharma, learned senior counsel submits that the petitioner was apprehended while taking illegal gratification to the tune of rs.45,000/-. he further submits that there is no ground for interference with the order of rejection of discharge petition. i have perused the impugned order. i do not find any defect in the order. the petition stands dismissed. the court below is required to proceed with the case so that the trial may come to its logical end without un-necessary delay. (rakesh kumar, j) n.h./
Judgment:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37496 of 2011 ====================================================== Naresh Paswan, son of Late Dhibu Paswan, resident of village Tekari, P.S. Rajaun, District Banka; Presently residing at Chitkohra Basti; by the side of Masjid, p.S. Gardanibagh, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar through the Vigilance .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR”

19. 01-2012 On call, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. In this case was passed over on 17.1.2012. Again yesterday, it was passed over on the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. Today, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Shri Rama Kant Sharma, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party i.e. Vigilance Investigation Bureau is present. The present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing of an order dated 12.9.2011 passed in Special Case No.36 of Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37496 of 2011 (3) dt.19-01-201”

2008. (arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No.48 of 2008). By the said order, the learned Special Judge has rejected the petition filed for discharge. Shri Rama Kant Sharma, learned Senior Counsel submits that the petitioner was apprehended while taking illegal gratification to the tune of Rs.45,000/-. He further submits that there is no ground for interference with the order of rejection of discharge petition. I have perused the impugned order. I do not find any defect in the order. The petition stands dismissed. The court below is required to proceed with the case so that the trial may come to its logical end without un-necessary delay. (Rakesh Kumar, J) N.H./