Rajan Ram Vs. the State of Bihar - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.187 of 2012 rajan ram versus the state of bihar 2. 13.01.2012. heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the state. the petitioner is languishing in custody since 18.10.2011 in a case registered for the offence under sections 364,302 and 201 of the indian penal code. the informants son went missing on 08.03.2011 when the f.i.r. was lodged on 12.12.2010 on recovery of dead body with accusation that the informant came to know that the f.i.r. named accused including the petitioner were seen lastly going with the deceased. learned counsel for the informant submits that three witnesses have deposed that the victim was last seen on 08.11.2010 in the company of petitioner and others. when these witnesses saw the victim lastly in the company of the petitioner and others on 08.11.2010 then there was no occasion for not lodging the f.i.r. immediately thereafter or not disclosing this fact in the f.i.r. at least. considering the suspicious nature of accusation and period under custody, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned a.c.j.m. bagaha, west champaran, in connection with balmikinagar p.s. case no. 87 of 2010. u. k. ( dinesh kumar singh, j)

Judgment:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.187 of 2012 Rajan Ram Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 13.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 18.10.2011 in a case registered for the offence under Sections 364,302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The informants son went missing on 08.03.2011 when the F.I.R. was lodged on 12.12.2010 on recovery of dead body with accusation that the informant came to know that the F.I.R. named accused including the petitioner were seen lastly going with the deceased. Learned counsel for the informant submits that three witnesses have deposed that the victim was last seen on 08.11.2010 in the company of petitioner and others. When these witnesses saw the victim lastly in the company of the petitioner and others on 08.11.2010 then there was no occasion for not lodging the F.I.R. immediately thereafter or not disclosing this fact in the F.I.R. at least. Considering the suspicious nature of accusation and period under custody, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. Bagaha, West Champaran, in connection with Balmikinagar P.S. Case No. 87 of 2010. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)