Mamta Devi Vs. the State of Bihar - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.42681 of 2011 mamta devi, wife of ajay kumar versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under section 304b/34 of the indian penal code. considering that the petitioner is the married sister- in-law of the deceased and final report was submitted with regard to the petitioner and the charge sheet was finally submitted u/s.306 i.p.c., let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today in connection with jehanabad p.s. case no.231 of 2011 on furnishing bail bonds of rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of additional district judge 2nd, jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the code of criminal procedure as also conditions (i) that one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. the bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be -2- present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled. narendra/ ( anjana prakash, j.)

Judgment:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42681 of 2011 Mamta Devi, wife of Ajay Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is the married sister- in-law of the deceased and final report was submitted with regard to the petitioner and the charge sheet was finally submitted u/s.306 I.P.C., let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Jehanabad P.S. case No.231 of 2011 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District Judge 2nd, Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be -2- present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J.

)