Md. Pappu Vs. the State of Bihar - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/974246
SubjectEducation
CourtPatna High Court
Decided OnMay-24-2012
AppellantMd. Pappu
RespondentThe State of Bihar
Advocates:Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha
Excerpt:
patna high court cr.misc. no.416 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.416 of 2012 ====================================================== md. pappu s/o md. rahim resident of mohalla- bibiganj, police station- sadar, district- muzaffarpur .... .... petitioner versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party =====================================================”24. 01-2012 the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 6.01.2010 passed in a case arising from muzaffarpur p.s. case no. 165 of 2008 (g.r.no.1825 of 2008, tr.no.827 of 2011) whereby the learned chief judicial magistrate, muzaffarpur has been pleased to take cognizance of the offences punishable under sections 379, 120b and 414 of the indian panel code against the petitioner . mr. chandra mohan jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, after some arguments seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to the petitioner to raise all the issues as raised in the present application at the stage of framing of charge. permission is allowed. this application is disposed of with the liberty aforesaid. (jyoti saran, j.) bibhash
Judgment:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.416 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.416 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Pappu S/O Md. Rahim resident of Mohalla- Bibiganj, Police Station- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party =====================================================”

24. 01-2012 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 6.01.2010 passed in a case arising from Muzaffarpur P.S. Case No. 165 of 2008 (G.R.No.1825 of 2008, Tr.No.827 of 2011) whereby the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur has been pleased to take cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 379, 120B and 414 of the Indian Panel Code against the petitioner . Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, after some arguments seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to the petitioner to raise all the issues as raised in the present application at the stage of framing of charge. Permission is allowed. This application is disposed of with the liberty aforesaid. (Jyoti Saran, J.) Bibhash