Kesa Ram Vs. State - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
s.b. crl. misc. 3rd bail appln. no. 8142/2012. kesa ram vs. state of rajasthan // 1 // 14 s.b. crl. misc. 3rd bail appln. no. 8142/2012. kesa ram vs. state of rajasthan .. date of order ::12. h february 2013. honble mr. justice dinesh maheshwari mr. n.s. khileri, for the applicant. mr. o.p. singaria, public prosecutor. by the court: after having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned public prosecutor for the state and having perused the material placed on record, this court does not feel persuaded to grant indulgence to the petitioner in this repeat bail plea. however, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, when the petitioner is said to be in custody since the month of july 2007, it is definitely expected of the learned trial court to assign utmost priority to the trial of the case and to bring the same to finality at the earliest. it shall also be expected of the prosecution to produce all its witnesses without delay and to take all steps for conclusion of the matter at the earliest. subject to the observations foregoing, this 3rd bail application under section 439 cr.p.c. moved on behalf of the accused petitioner kesa ram son of punaram @ puranmal stands rejected at this stage. (dinesh maheshwari), j.//mohan//

Judgment:
S.B. CRL. MISC. 3rd BAIL APPLN. NO. 8142/2012. Kesa Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan // 1 // 14 S.B. CRL. MISC. 3rd BAIL APPLN. NO. 8142/2012. Kesa Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan .. Date of Order ::

12. h February 2013. HONBLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. N.S. Khileri, for the applicant. Mr. O.P. Singaria, Public Prosecutor. <<>> BY THE COURT: After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and having perused the material placed on record, this Court does not feel persuaded to grant indulgence to the petitioner in this repeat bail plea. However, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, when the petitioner is said to be in custody since the month of July 2007, it is definitely expected of the learned Trial Court to assign utmost priority to the trial of the case and to bring the same to finality at the earliest. It shall also be expected of the prosecution to produce all its witnesses without delay and to take all steps for conclusion of the matter at the earliest. Subject to the observations foregoing, this 3rd bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. moved on behalf of the accused petitioner Kesa Ram son of Punaram @ Puranmal stands rejected at this stage. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J.

//Mohan//