Parvati Devi and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi a.b.a.no.2026of2012 1. parvatidevi.2. anitadevi.3. dukhnidevi.4. sabitridevi.5. umadevi.6. sumadevi.7. santidevi.8. maltidevi.9. babanmahto.10. amritmahto.11. sunilmahto.12. yamunamahto.13. pintumahto. ... ... ... ... ... ...petitioners versus the state of jharkhand. ... ... ... ... ... ...opp. party coram: thehonblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay. forthepetitioner: mr.h.k.shikarwar,advocate. forthestate: a.p .p. 03/17.09.2012 itisallegedinthefirstinformationreportthatthepetitionerswith theirassociatesafterformingunlawfulassembly,committedhousetrespassand causedassaulttotheinformantandhisfamilymembers. itissubmittedthatthespecificallegationofcausingassaultisonly againstsantoshimahtoandtheallegationoftheftisagainstgyanimahto,who are not the petitioner at present. as a matter of fact, the petitioners and the informantarethegotiasandtheyarehavinglanddispute. learnedcounselforthestatehasopposedtheprayer. it seems that maximum numbers of family members of accused havebeenimplicatedwithgeneralandomnibusallegation. consideringtheaforesaidaspectofthematter,thepetitionersare directedtosurrenderbeforethecourtbelowwithinthreeweeksfromtodayand iftheydosotheywillbereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/ (tenthousand)eachwithtwosuretiesoflikeamounteachtothesatisfactionof srisanjaysinghyadav,judicialmagistrate,1stclass,hazaribaghinconnection with tatijhariya p.s. case no. 11 of 2012, corresponding to g.r.no. 1052 of 2012,subjecttotheconditionsaslaiddownundersection438(2)ofthecodeof criminalprocedure. [d.n.upadhyay,j.] p.k.s.

Judgment:
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2026of2012 1. ParvatiDevi.

2. AnitaDevi.

3. DukhniDevi.

4. SabitriDevi.

5. UmaDevi.

6. SumaDevi.

7. SantiDevi.

8. MaltiDevi.

9. BabanMahto.

10. AmritMahto.

11. SunilMahto.

12. YamunaMahto.

13. PintuMahto. ... ... ... ... ... ...Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ... ... ... ...Opp. Party CORAM: THEHONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY. ForthePetitioner: Mr.H.K.Shikarwar,Advocate. FortheState: A.P .P. 03/17.09.2012 ItisallegedintheFirstInformationReportthatthepetitionerswith theirassociatesafterformingunlawfulassembly,committedhousetrespassand causedassaulttotheinformantandhisfamilymembers. Itissubmittedthatthespecificallegationofcausingassaultisonly againstSantoshiMahtoandtheallegationoftheftisagainstGyaniMahto,who are not the petitioner at present. As a matter of fact, the petitioners and the informantaretheGotiasandtheyarehavinglanddispute. LearnedCounselfortheStatehasopposedtheprayer. It seems that maximum numbers of family members of accused havebeenimplicatedwithgeneralandomnibusallegation. Consideringtheaforesaidaspectofthematter,thepetitionersare directedtosurrenderbeforethecourtbelowwithinthreeweeksfromtodayand iftheydosotheywillbereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/ (Tenthousand)eachwithtwosuretiesoflikeamounteachtothesatisfactionof SriSanjaySinghYadav,JudicialMagistrate,1stClass,Hazaribaghinconnection with Tatijhariya P.S. Case No. 11 of 2012, corresponding to G.R.No. 1052 of 2012,subjecttotheconditionsaslaiddownunderSection438(2)oftheCodeof CriminalProcedure. [D.N.Upadhyay,J.] P.K.S.