Dilip Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no. 6287 of 2012 dilip kumar singh ... petitioner. versus the state of jharkhand ... opp. party. coram: - honble mr. justice alok singh ------------- for the petitioner(s) : mr. a.k. kashyap sr. advocate m/s ravi prakash & awanish shekhar, adv. for the state : mr. moti gope, a.p.p. 02/01.09.2012: learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been implicated in the present case on the basis of confessional statement made by the co-accused, namely, manoj bhuiyan. he further submits that the confessional statement made by co-accused cannot be made basis for conviction of the accused applicant. he further contends that battery recovered from the house of the petitioner, belongs to the father of the petitioner and father of the petitioner has already moved an application for release of the battery in question before the magistrate. he further contends that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 19.06.2012. considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, i direct that let the petitioner, namely, dilip kumar singh be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties bond to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, palamau at daltonganj, in connection with paton p.s. case no. 41 of 2012 (corresponding to g.r. no. 618 of 2012). (alok singh, j) sharma

Judgment:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6287 of 2012 Dilip Kumar Singh ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opp. Party. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH ------------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.K. Kashyap Sr. Advocate M/s Ravi Prakash & Awanish Shekhar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Moti Gope, A.P.P. 02/01.09.2012: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been implicated in the present case on the basis of confessional statement made by the co-accused, namely, Manoj Bhuiyan. He further submits that the confessional statement made by co-accused cannot be made basis for conviction of the accused applicant. He further contends that battery recovered from the house of the petitioner, belongs to the father of the petitioner and father of the petitioner has already moved an application for release of the battery in question before the Magistrate. He further contends that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 19.06.2012. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct that let the petitioner, namely, Dilip Kumar Singh be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties bond to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau at Daltonganj, in connection with Paton P.S. Case No. 41 of 2012 (corresponding to G.R. No. 618 of 2012). (ALOK SINGH, J) Sharma