Sumitra Devi and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi a.b.a.no.2443of2012 1.sumitradevi 2.pintuyadav@pintukumaryadav 3.saraswatidevi ... ... petitioners versus thestateofjharkhand ... ... ...oppositeparty coram :hon'blemrs.justicejayaroy forthepetitioners :mr.deepakkumar,advocate forthestate :a.p.p. 02/01.09.2012 heard counsel appearing for the petitioners and counsel appearingforthestate. petitionersare apprehending their arrest inconnection with the case registered under sections 323/504/498a/379 of the indianpenalcode. counselappearingforthepetitionersispermittedtoaddthe informant/complainantasoppositepartyno.2inthiscase. issue notice to the opposite party no.2 in the admission matteratherpresentandcorrectaddressbyregisteredpostwitha/das wellasbyordinaryprocess,forwhichrequisiteetc.mustbefiledwithin oneweekfromthedateofthisorder,failingwhichthisapplicationshall standrejectedwithoutfurtherreferencetothebench. ruleismadereturnableintheadmissionmatterwithinsix weeks. till1stnovember,2012,policewillnotarrestthepetitioners namely sumitra devi and pintu yadav @ pintu kumar yadav in connectionwiththepresentcasei.e.kodermamahilap.s.caseno.28 of2011correspondingtog.r.no.1112of2011pendinginthecourtof shriv.k.srivastava,civiljudge,judicialdivisionno.6,koderma. counselappearingforthepetitionershassubmittedthatthe petitionerno.3 is married sisterinlawand she is residingin another village,therefore,itisfalsetosaythatshehascommittedanyoffenceor assaultedthecomplainant. considering the fact that the petitioner no.3 is married sisterinlawandsheisresidinginanothervillage,idirectthepetitioner no.3 namely saraswati devi, above named, to surrender in the trial court/courtbelowwithinaperiodofonemonthfromthedateofthis (2) a.b.a.no.2443of2012 orderandifshesurrenders,thetrialcourt/courtbelowwillreleaseher onbailonfurnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rs.tenthousand)with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of shri v.k. srivastava, civil judge,juniordivision no.6,kodermainconnection withkodermamahilap.s.caseno.28of2011correspondingtog.r. no.1112of2011withtheconditionsthatoneofthebailorswillbelocal residenthavingimmovablepropertywithinthejurisdictionofthedistrict concernedandsubjecttotheconditionslaiddownundersection438(2) ofthecodeofcriminalprocedure. counselforthepetitionerswilldepositthecostofthefaxto communicatethisordertothecourtconcerned. (jayaroy,j.) anit

Judgment:
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2443of2012 1.SumitraDevi 2.PintuYadav@PintuKumarYadav 3.SaraswatiDevi ... ... Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand ... ... ...OppositeParty CORAM :HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioners :Mr.DeepakKumar,Advocate FortheState :A.P.P. 02/01.09.2012 Heard counsel appearing for the petitioners and counsel appearingfortheState. Petitionersare apprehending their arrest inconnection with the case registered under Sections 323/504/498A/379 of the IndianPenalCode. Counselappearingforthepetitionersispermittedtoaddthe informant/complainantasoppositepartyno.2inthiscase. Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 in the admission matteratherpresentandcorrectaddressbyregisteredpostwithA/Das wellasbyordinaryprocess,forwhichrequisiteetc.mustbefiledwithin oneweekfromthedateofthisorder,failingwhichthisapplicationshall standrejectedwithoutfurtherreferencetotheBench. Ruleismadereturnableintheadmissionmatterwithinsix weeks. Till1stNovember,2012,policewillnotarrestthepetitioners namely Sumitra Devi and Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar Yadav in connectionwiththepresentcasei.e.KodermaMahilaP.S.CaseNo.28 of2011correspondingtoG.R.No.1112of2011pendingintheCourtof ShriV.K.Srivastava,CivilJudge,JudicialDivisionNo.6,Koderma. Counselappearingforthepetitionershassubmittedthatthe petitionerno.3 is married sisterinlawand she is residingin another village,therefore,itisfalsetosaythatshehascommittedanyoffenceor assaultedthecomplainant. Considering the fact that the petitioner no.3 is married sisterinlawandsheisresidinginanothervillage,Idirectthepetitioner no.3 namely Saraswati Devi, above named, to surrender in the trial Court/Courtbelowwithinaperiodofonemonthfromthedateofthis (2) A.B.A.No.2443of2012 orderandifshesurrenders,thetrialCourt/Courtbelowwillreleaseher onbailonfurnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/(Rs.Tenthousand)with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri V.K. Srivastava, Civil Judge,JuniorDivision No.6,Kodermainconnection withKodermaMahilaP.S.CaseNo.28of2011correspondingtoG.R. No.1112of2011withtheconditionsthatoneofthebailorswillbelocal residenthavingimmovablepropertywithinthejurisdictionofthedistrict concernedandsubjecttotheconditionslaiddownunderSection438(2) oftheCodeofCriminalProcedure. CounselforthepetitionerswilldepositthecostoftheFAXto communicatethisordertotheCourtconcerned. (JayaRoy,J.) Anit