Anil Kumar R and ors. Vs. the State of KarnatakA. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/925587
SubjectCriminal
CourtKarnataka High Court
Decided OnFeb-28-2012
Case NumberCRIMINAL PETITION No. 1130 OF 2012 CW CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1142 OF 2012
JudgeSubhash B Adi, J.
ActsIndian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 - Sections 399, 402; Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) 1973 - Section 439
AppellantAnil Kumar R and ors.
RespondentThe State of KarnatakA.
Advocates:SRI HARISH KUMAR M C; SAI LAW ASSOCIATES. ADVS
Excerpt:
[subhash b adi, j.] crl.p filed u/s.439 cr.p.c fraying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in cr.no.90/12 of rajagopalnagara p.3., bangalore, for the offences p/u/s 399, 402 of ipc.1. petitioners in these petitions are accused nos. 1,2 and 3. case has been registered against them in crime no.90/ 2012 by rajagopalanagara police, bangalore city, for the offences punishable under sections 399, 402 of ipc.2. these accused have been apprehended on suspicion that they had made a preparation to commit dacoity.3. learned high court government pleader submits that there is only one case registered against these petitioners.4. having regard to the same, i find that the petitioners could be enlarged on bail subject to certain conditions.5. accordingly, these petitions are allowed. petitioners are enlarged on bail subject to the following conditions:(i) the petitioners shall execute a personal bond for rs.25,000/- each with two solvent sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial court,(ii) the petitioners shall regularly- attend the court on hearing dates.(iii) the petitioners shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.
Judgment:

1. Petitioners in these petitions are accused Nos. 1,2 and 3. Case has been registered against them in Crime No.90/ 2012 by RajagopaLanagara Police, Bangalore City, for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 of IPC.

2. These accused have been apprehended on suspicion that they had made a preparation to commit dacoity.

3. Learned High Court Government Pleader submits that there is only one case registered against these petitioners.

4. Having regard to the same, I find that the petitioners could be enlarged on bail subject to certain conditions.

5. Accordingly, these petitions are allowed. Petitioners are enlarged on bail subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioners shall execute a personal bond for Rs.25,000/- each with two solvent sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court,

(ii) The petitioners shall regularly- attend the Court on hearing dates.

(iii) The petitioners shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.