Niraj kumar and ors. Vs. the state of jharkhand - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/918282
SubjectCriminal
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided OnJun-02-2011
Case NumberB.A.  No. 4023 of 2011
JudgeJayaâ Roy, J.
ActsIndian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 324, 341, 323, 504, 509, 307, 34
AppellantNiraj kumar and ors.
Respondentthe state of jharkhand
Appellant AdvocateMr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv.
Respondent AdvocateMr. P.K. Appu, Adv.
Excerpt:
1. heard the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the state. the petitioners are accused in this case registered under sections 324/341/323/504/509, 307/34 of the indian penal code. 2. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant party was aggressor and he has lodged case against the petitioners earlier to the present case. it is further submitted that petitioner no. 2 has also received some injury for which, he was admitted in rims for a week and, thereafter, he has surrendered before the court in connection with the present case. 3. learned counsel for the petitioners, has further submitted that both the petitioners are in custody from 04.05.2011. 4. considering the fact and circumstance of the case and considering the fact that the petitioners are in custody for nearly a month, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/( ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, bokaro in connection with marafari p.s. case no. 23 of 2011, corresponding to g.r. no. 477 of 2011, subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be their close relative having immovable property within the jurisdiction of the trial court concerned.
Judgment:

1. Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the State.

The petitioners are accused in this case registered under Sections 324/341/323/504/509, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant party was aggressor and he has lodged case against the petitioners earlier to the present case. It is further submitted that petitioner no. 2 has also received some injury for which, he was admitted in RIMS for a week and, thereafter, he has surrendered before the court in connection with the present case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, has further submitted that both the petitioners are in custody from 04.05.2011.

4. Considering the fact and circumstance of the case and considering the fact that the petitioners are in custody for nearly a month, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/( Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro in connection with Marafari P.S. Case No. 23 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No. 477 of 2011, subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be their close relative having immovable property within the jurisdiction of the trial court concerned.