| SooperKanoon Citation | sooperkanoon.com/906859 |
| Court | Delhi High Court |
| Decided On | Dec-02-2010 |
| Case Number | Crl. M.B. 1101 of 2010 in Crl. A. No. 930 of 2010 |
| Judge | Shiv Narayan Dhingra .J. |
| Appellant | Dinesh |
| Respondent | State |
| Appellant Advocate | Ms. Tanveer Ahmed Mir; Mr. Pratik Batta, Advs. |
| Respondent Advocate | Mr. Sunil Sharma, Adv. |
2. The counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and the identification of the applicant by the prosecutrix and her mother did not inspired confidence.
3. I have gone through the testimony of witnesses. I consider that it is not a fit case for suspension of sentence at this stage. However, the appeal of the appellant be heard expeditiously and be listed for hearing on 7th February, 2011