Sunil Kumar.Vs. State. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/902333
SubjectLand Acquisition
CourtDelhi High Court
Decided OnAug-30-2010
Case NumberCrl. Revision No.406 of 2008
JudgeShiv Narayan Dhingra,J.
AppellantSunil Kumar.
RespondentState.
Appellant AdvocateMr. Raman Sahney,; Mr. Santosh Kumar,Advs.
Respondent AdvocateMr. O.P. Saxena,Adv.
Excerpt:
[k.l. manjunath,;b.manohar,jj.]this m pa filed under section 37(1) (a) of the arbitration and conciliation act, against the order dated:21.08.2010, passed on i a.no.2 in a.a. no.733/2010 on the file of the city civil .judge (arbitral court), bangalore, issuing notice on i.a.no.2 filed u/s 9 of arbitration and conciliation act r/w order 39 rule 1 and 2 & sec. 151 of cpc, for this appeal coming on for admission this day, manjunath j, delivered the following;1. whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. to be referred to the reporter or not?3. whether judgment should be reported in digest?order1. in view of my decision in baharat @ popat v state bail appln. no.1943/2009, this petition is not maintainable and is hereby dismissed
Judgment:
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporter or not?

3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?

ORDER

1. In view of my decision in Baharat @ Popat v State Bail Appln. No.1943/2009, this petition is not maintainable and is hereby dismissed