In Re: K. Vasudevan - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
- order3. it seems to us cleat that the passing of the amending act, even though it changes the law with retrospective effect, is not a sufficient reason for re-opening matters which have already been decided on the basis of the law as it stood before the amendment. the petition to excuse delay and the petition for review are therefore dismissed.

Judgment:
ORDER

3. It seems to us cleat that the passing of the Amending Act, even though it changes the law With retrospective effect, is not a sufficient reason for re-opening matters which have already been decided on the basis of the law as it stood before the amendment. The petition to excuse delay and the petition for review are therefore dismissed.