Prithvi Raj Vs. State and ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/772467
SubjectCriminal
CourtRajasthan High Court
Decided OnMar-27-2001
Case NumberS.B. Cri. Misc. Petition No. 26 of 2001
JudgeBhagwati Prasad, J.
Reported in2001(1)WLN736
AppellantPrithvi Raj
RespondentState and ors.
DispositionPetition dismissed
Excerpt:
criminal procedure code, 1973 - section 482--question regarding the second marriage of petitioner is a question of fact--concurrent finding of courts below on this question--no case for interference under section 482.;misc. petition dismissed - bhagwati prasad, j.1. heard.2. the present petition has been filed to impugn the orders wherein the wife has been held entitled for manitenance the learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the courts below has wrongly assumed that the petitioner has remarried. this is a question of fact. which has been found to be established on application of facts.3. no case for interference under section 482 cr. p.c. in exercise of inherent powers...by this court is made out. the misc. petition having no force is hereby dismissed.
Judgment:

Bhagwati Prasad, J.

1. Heard.

2. The present petition has been filed to impugn the orders wherein the wife has been held entitled for manitenance the learned Counsel for the petitioner has urged that the courts below has wrongly assumed that the petitioner has remarried. This is a question of fact. Which has been found to be established on application of facts.

3. No case for interference under Section 482 Cr. P.C. in exercise of inherent powers...by this Court is made out. The misc. petition having no force is hereby dismissed.