Devi Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
criminal procedure code - section 482--total sentence of 6 years already elapsed--held, it is no use to direct concurrent running of sentence.;appeal dismissed - labour & servicesappointment: [shiv kumar sharma, ashok parihar & k.s. rathore, jj] merit list rajasthan secondary education act (42 of 1957), section 28 & rajasthan board of secondary education rules, rule 20 - held, improved marks obtained by candidate after re-appearing in examination can be considered for drawing the merit list of candidate for appointment to post of teacher. circular issued by the director of primary & secondary education ousting such candidate from consideration in merit list is illegal and without jurisdiction.shyam sunder byas, j.1. in his application under section 482 cr. pc it was prayed by the accused devi lal that the sentences of imprisonment awarded to him may be directed to run concurrently. the accused was sentenced by two judgments dated 3-4-1980. by now he must have served all the terms of sentences. the total sentence awarded to him was of six years which must have elapsed somewhere in the year 1986.2. in view of the aforesaid circumstances, there is no use in directing this sentence to run concurrently. the accused's application under section 482, cr. pc is, therefore, dismissed.