Vinod Kumar Vs. State - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/708085
SubjectCriminal
CourtDelhi High Court
Decided OnAug-14-2002
Case NumberCrl. M.M. No. 2241 of 2002
JudgeMahmood Ali Khan, J.
Reported in100(2002)DLT186
ActsIndian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 324; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27
AppellantVinod Kumar
RespondentState
Appellant Advocate Javed Alvi, Adv
Respondent Advocate Richa Kapur, A.P.P.
Excerpt:
the case discussed the feasibility of grant of bail to the petitioner on account of allegation of stab injuries with knife-the doctor did not give any opinion as to the nature of injuries-there was a registration of cross case and there was likelihood of case taking a long time- the petitioner was admitted to bail on furnishing bond in sum of rs. 10, 000/- - - 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court on further condition that he shall not try to contact the prosecution witnesses and tamper with evidence.ordermahmood ali khan, j.1. two cross cases have been registered in respect of the same incident. the case fir no. 709/02 is registered on the complaint of the petitioner under section 324, ipc read with section 34, ipc and section 27 of the arms act. in the instant case the allegation is that the petitioner has given stab injuries with knife and stabbed on the stomach of the complainant which caused injuries 2.5 x 1.5 cm., on the lower chest 2.5 x 2 cm., on the skull 8 cm. x 2.5 cm. and 6 x 0.5 cm. apart from another stab wound on (sic.) muscle 5 x 1.5 cm. and 5 x 1.5 cm. and the injured was discharged on the next date. app has stated that the doctor has not yet given the opinion about the nature of the injury whether it was grievous or simple although two months have passed. the injured was discharged on the following day.2. keeping in view the allegations made that the assailant party was armed with knife and a sword and a cross case has been registered and the case is also likely to take a long time, i admit the petitioner to bail. he shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court on further condition that he shall not try to contact the prosecution witnesses and tamper with evidence.petition stands disposed of.
Judgment:
ORDER

Mahmood Ali Khan, J.

1. Two cross cases have been registered in respect of the same incident. The case FIR No. 709/02 is registered on the complaint of the petitioner under Section 324, IPC read with Section 34, IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. In the instant case the allegation is that the petitioner has given stab injuries with knife and stabbed on the stomach of the complainant which caused injuries 2.5 x 1.5 cm., on the lower chest 2.5 x 2 cm., on the skull 8 cm. x 2.5 cm. and 6 x 0.5 cm. apart from another stab wound on (sic.) muscle 5 x 1.5 cm. and 5 x 1.5 cm. and the injured was discharged on the next date. APP has stated that the doctor has not yet given the opinion about the nature of the injury whether it was grievous or simple although two months have passed. The injured was discharged on the following day.

2. Keeping in view the allegations made that the assailant party was armed with knife and a sword and a cross case has been registered and the case is also likely to take a long time, I admit the petitioner to bail. He shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court on further condition that he shall not try to contact the prosecution witnesses and tamper with evidence.

Petition stands disposed of.