R.R. Construction Vs. Cce - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/46228
SubjectService Tax
CourtCustoms Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided OnSep-28-2007
JudgeR Abichandani
AppellantR.R. Construction
RespondentCce
Excerpt:
1. an obvious mistake has crept in, in the order dt. 24.7.07, by which it was directed that the applicant should deposit rs. 3,50,000 (rupees three lakhs and fifty thousand only) @ rs. 100/- per day being penalty imposed under section 76 for a period of about 11 months. the said amount payable would be about rs. 35,000/- but was typed as rs. 3,50,000/- in the stay order. the words rs. 3,50,000/- (rs. three lakhs and fifty thousand only) are, therefore, ordered to be substituted by the words "rs. 35,000/-(rupees thirty five thousand only). the order stands rectified accordingly. the time to make the deposit of rs. 35,000/- is extended by two weeks. this application stands disposed of accordingly. to come up for reporting compliance on 22.10.07.
Judgment:
1. An obvious mistake has crept in, in the order dt. 24.7.07, by which it was directed that the applicant should deposit Rs. 3,50,000 (rupees three lakhs and fifty thousand only) @ Rs. 100/- per day being penalty imposed under Section 76 for a period of about 11 months. The said amount payable would be about Rs. 35,000/- but was typed as Rs. 3,50,000/- in the stay order. The words Rs. 3,50,000/- (Rs. three lakhs and fifty thousand only) are, therefore, ordered to be substituted by the words "Rs. 35,000/-(rupees thirty five thousand only). The order stands rectified accordingly. The time to make the deposit of Rs. 35,000/- is extended by two weeks. This application stands disposed of accordingly. To come up for reporting compliance on 22.10.07.