Sudevan vs Dibi - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1899278
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnSep-30-2019
Case NumberMat.Appeal/937/2015
JudgeHonourable Mr.Justice K.Harilal,Honourable Mrs. Justice Annie John
AppellantSudevan
RespondentDIBI
Excerpt:
& mat.appeal.no.937 of 2015 against the judgment in op 890/2010 dated 27-02-2015 of family appellant/1st respondent: sudevan pulikkan house, cherukunnu desom, p.o.vettukad. respondents/petitioner & respondents 2 & 3: aged 29 years, d/o.narayanan, mambully house, pullu desom and p.o, thrissur, 680 001. 2 karthu kandukutty aged about 60 years, w/o.late kandukutty, 3 geetha aged about 39 years, d/o.late kandukutty, by adv. sri.c.a.chacko by adv. sri.sumodh madhavan nair30.09.2019, along with mat.appeal.1184/2015, the court on the same day delivered the following: mat.appeal nos.937/15 & 1184/2015 2 & mat.appeal.no.1184 of 2015 against the judgment in op 890/2010 dated 27.2.2015 of family appellants/2nd and 3rd respondents: 1 karthu kandukutty aged 60 years w/o.late kandukutty, pulikkan house,cherukunnu desom, p.o,vettukad.2 geetha aged 39 years d/o.late kandukutty, pulikkan house, pullu desom and p.o., thrissur-680001. respondents/petitioner & 1st respondent: aged 29 years d/o narayanan,mambully house, pullu desom.p.o,thrissur-680001. 2 sudevan s/o.late kandukutty,pulikkan house, cherukunnu desom, p.o.vettukad-680001. r1 by adv. sri.c.a.chacko 30.09.2019, along with mat.appeal.937/2015, the court on the same day delivered the following: mat.appeal nos.937/15 & 1184/2015 3judgmentk.harilal, j.the learned counsel for the appellants submits that these appeals are not pressed. in view of the said submission, these appeals would stand dismissed as not pressed. k.harilal, judge annie john, judge csl
Judgment:

& Mat.Appeal.No.937 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 890/2010 DATED 27-02-2015 OF FAMILY APPELLANT/1st RESPONDENT: SUDEVAN PULIKKAN HOUSE, CHERUKUNNU DESOM, P.O.VETTUKAD. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 2 & 3: AGED 29 YEARS, D/O.NARAYANAN, MAMBULLY HOUSE, PULLU DESOM AND P.O, THRISSUR, 680 001. 2 KARTHU KANDUKUTTY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O.LATE KANDUKUTTY, 3 GEETHA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, D/O.LATE KANDUKUTTY, BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO BY ADV. SRI.SUMODH MADHAVAN NAIR

30.09.2019, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.1184/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mat.Appeal Nos.937/15 & 1184/2015 2 & Mat.Appeal.No.1184 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 890/2010 DATED 27.2.2015 OF FAMILY APPELLANTS/2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS: 1 KARTHU KANDUKUTTY AGED 60 YEARS W/O.LATE KANDUKUTTY, PULIKKAN HOUSE,CHERUKUNNU DESOM, P.O,VETTUKAD.

2 GEETHA AGED 39 YEARS D/O.LATE KANDUKUTTY, PULIKKAN HOUSE, PULLU DESOM AND P.O., THRISSUR-680001. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & 1ST RESPONDENT: AGED 29 YEARS D/O NARAYANAN,MAMBULLY HOUSE, PULLU DESOM.P.O,THRISSUR-680001. 2 SUDEVAN S/O.LATE KANDUKUTTY,PULIKKAN HOUSE, CHERUKUNNU DESOM, P.O.VETTUKAD-680001. R1 BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO 30.09.2019, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.937/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mat.Appeal Nos.937/15 & 1184/2015 3

JUDGMENT

K.Harilal, J.

The learned counsel for the appellants submits that these appeals are not pressed. In view of the said submission, these appeals would stand dismissed as not pressed. K.HARILAL, JUDGE ANNIE JOHN, JUDGE csl