Abhilash Mumar vs S. Sunil - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1896113
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnDec-04-2019
Case NumberOP (MAC)/93/2018
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice a.Muhamed Mustaque
AppellantAbhilash Mumar
RespondentS. Sunil
Excerpt:
op (mac).no.88 of 2018(o) against the order dated 22.6.2018 in e.a.no.156/2018 in e.p.no.48/2018 in op(mv)no.534/2011 of the motor accidents claims tribunal, attingal 1 s. sunil vilabhagom, varkala, thiruvananthapuram. 2 aneeshkumar s/o. sasidharan pillai, this op (mac) having been finally heard on 04.12.2019, along with op (mac).93/2018(o), the court on the same day delivered the following: -2- op (mac).no.93 of 2018 against the order dated 29.6.2018 in i.a.no.8458/2017 in op(mv) 1 s. sunil, vilabhagom, varkala, 2 aneeshkumar, s/o.s asidharan pillai, this op (mac) having been finally heard on 04.12.2019, along with op (mac).88/2018(o), the court on the same day delivered the following: -3-judgment[ op (mac no.88/2018, op (mac)no.93/2018 ] dated this the 4th day of december 2019 the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter is not pressed. accordingly, these original petitions are dismissed as not pressed. sd/- a.muhamed mustaque judge akv
Judgment:

OP (MAC).No.88 OF 2018(O) AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22.6.2018 IN E.A.NO.156/2018 IN E.P.NO.48/2018 IN OP(MV)NO.534/2011 OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, ATTINGAL 1 S. SUNIL VILABHAGOM, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2 ANEESHKUMAR S/O. SASIDHARAN PILLAI, THIS OP (MAC) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.12.2019, ALONG WITH OP (MAC).93/2018(O), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2- OP (MAC).No.93 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29.6.2018 IN I.A.NO.8458/2017 IN OP(MV) 1 S. SUNIL, VILABHAGOM, VARKALA, 2 ANEESHKUMAR, S/O.S ASIDHARAN PILLAI, THIS OP (MAC) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.12.2019, ALONG WITH OP (MAC).88/2018(O), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -3-

JUDGMENT

[ OP (MAC No.88/2018, OP (MAC)No.93/2018 ] Dated this the 4th day of December 2019 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter is not pressed. Accordingly, these original petitions are dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE akv