Rajamony vs State of Kerala - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1850883
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnJan-14-2019
Case NumberBail Appl./2391/2018
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice a.M.Babu
AppellantRajamony
RespondentState of Kerala
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.m.babu monday ,the 14th day of january 2019 / 24th pousha, 1940 bail appl..no. 2391 of 2018 crime no. 55/2018 of kayamkulam excise range office , alappuzha petitioner/accused rajamony aged 55 years, w/o.soman, remya bhavanam, kandalloor, karthikappally taluk, alappuzha. by advs. sri.r.sunil kumar smt.a.salini lal respondent/de-facto complainant state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala at ernakualam through excise inspector, kayamkulam - 689 103 other present: p.p- smt. k.k .sheeba this bail application having come up for admission on 14.01.2019, the court on the same day passed the following: b.a.2391/2018orderthis case was called during the morning session at 11.35 am and 12.05 pm. there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. even when the case is called now at 3.35 pm, there is no representation. the learned public prosecutor is present. it appears that the non- representation is either because the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the matter or because the application has become infructuous. the application is dismissed for non-prosecution. mrcs/14.1.19 true copy p.s.to judge
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BABU MONDAY ,THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 24TH POUSHA, 1940 Bail Appl..No. 2391 of 2018 CRIME NO. 55/2018 OF Kayamkulam Excise Range Office , Alappuzha PETITIONER/ACCUSED RAJAMONY AGED 55 YEARS, W/O.SOMAN, REMYA BHAVANAM, KANDALLOOR, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADVS. SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL RESPONDENT/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKUALAM THROUGH EXCISE INSPECTOR, KAYAMKULAM - 689 103 OTHER PRESENT: P.P- SMT. K.K .SHEEBA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.2391/2018

ORDER

This case was called during the morning session at 11.35 am and 12.05 pm. There was no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even when the case is called now at 3.35 pm, there is no representation. The learned public prosecutor is present. It appears that the non- representation is either because the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the matter or because the application has become infructuous. The application is dismissed for non-prosecution. Mrcs/14.1.19 True copy P.S.To Judge