Prashanth Kumar vs the Superintendent of Police, - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1782143
CourtChennai Orders High Court
Decided OnFeb-27-2025
Case NumberCRL OP/5460/2025
JudgeHonourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
AppellantPrashanth Kumar
RespondentThe Superintendent of Police,
Excerpt:
in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27.02.2025coram:the honourable mr. justice g.k.ilanthiraiyan prashanth kumar ... petitioner vs4. r.narayanaswami ... respondents prayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 528 of the bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023 to direct the second for petitioner : mr.m.mohamed afridi for r1 to r3 : mr.k.m.d.muhilan government advocate (crl.side)orderthis petition has been filed for direction directing the second2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side) for the respondents 1 to 3 and perused the materials placed on record.3. the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, petition enquiry was conducted and the same was closed.4. recording the above said submission, this criminal originalpetition stands closed. it is made clear that, since the complaint has been closed, the respondent shall not call the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and harass him. internet:yes index:yes/nospeaking/non speaking ordermn g.k.ilanthiraiyan. j, mn to4. the public prosecutor, high court, madras.
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.02.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Prashanth Kumar ... Petitioner Vs

4. R.Narayanaswami ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to direct the second For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mohamed Afridi For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed for direction directing the second

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondents 1 to 3 and perused the materials placed on record.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, petition enquiry was conducted and the same was closed.

4. Recording the above said submission, this Criminal Original

Petition stands closed. It is made clear that, since the complaint has been closed, the respondent shall not call the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and harass him. Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non speaking order

mn G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, mn To

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.