Govindhammal vs M.Perumal - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1703839
CourtChennai Orders High Court
Decided OnAug-22-2025
Case NumberCMP/19331/2025
JudgeHonourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi
AppellantGovindhammal
RespondentM.Perumal
Excerpt:
these petitions have been filed (i) to condone the delay of 189 daysin filing this petition to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant, (ii) to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole appellant, viz., m. nagesh, and (iii) to bring on record the petitioners 1 to 7 herein, who are the legal heirs of the deceased appellant, as appellants 2 to 8, in s.a. no.666/2022, respectively.2. the learned counsel for the respondents did not raise anyobjection in allowing these petitions and this court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavits filed in support of the above petitions. hence, these civil miscellaneous petitions are allowed.3. the registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in s.a. no.666 of 2022 and list the same on 15.09.2025. [½] bga bga [1/2]
Judgment:

These petitions have been filed (i) to condone the delay of 189 days

in filing this petition to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant, (ii) to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole appellant, viz., M. Nagesh, and (iii) to bring on record the petitioners 1 to 7 herein, who are the legal heirs of the deceased appellant, as appellants 2 to 8, in S.A. No.666/2022, respectively.

2. The learned counsel for the respondents did not raise any

objection in allowing these petitions and this Court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavits filed in support of the above petitions. Hence, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed.

3. The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in S.A. No.666 of 2022 and list the same on 15.09.2025. [½] bga bga [1/2]