Sandeep Kumar, vs Greeshma, - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1703311
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnFeb-24-2021
Case NumberMat.Appeal/44/2019
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice a.Muhamed Mustaque,Honourable Mr.Justice C.S.Dias
AppellantSandeep Kumar,
RespondentGreeshma,
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.muhamed mustaque & the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias wednesday, the 24th day of february 2021 / 5th phalguna, against the order/judgment in op 70/2016 dated 14-06-2018 of family court,thrissur appellants: 1 sandeep kumar, s/o p.b. sathian, m.m. garden, pandeswar, mangaluru, 575 003, represented by the power of attorney holder, santhosh kumar, s/o p.b. sathian, aged 32 years, m.m. garden, 2 p.b. sathian, aged 65 years, m.m. garden, 3 dhanalakshmi, aged 60 years, w/o sathian, m.m. garden, pandeswar, mangaluru, 575 003. by adv. sri.binoy vasudevan respondent: greeshma, aged 24 years, d/o m.a. krishna mani, paramel pady street, kondazhy village, talappilly taluk, thrissur district-679 106. r1 by adv. sri.rajit this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 24.02.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..2..judgmentdated this the 24th day of february 2021 a.muhamed mustaque, j the learned counsel for the appellant submitsthat the matter has been settled out of court. in view of the above, he is not pressing the mat. appeal. accordingly, the mat. appeal is dismissedas not pressed. all pending interlocutory applications, if any, are closed. a.muhamed mustaque c.s.dias pr
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 5TH PHALGUNA, AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 70/2016 DATED 14-06-2018 OF FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR APPELLANTS: 1 SANDEEP KUMAR, S/O P.B. SATHIAN, M.M. GARDEN, PANDESWAR, MANGALURU, 575 003, REPRESENTED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SANTHOSH KUMAR, S/O P.B. SATHIAN, AGED 32 YEARS, M.M. GARDEN, 2 P.B. SATHIAN, AGED 65 YEARS, M.M. GARDEN, 3 DHANALAKSHMI, AGED 60 YEARS, W/O SATHIAN, M.M. GARDEN, PANDESWAR, MANGALURU, 575 003. BY ADV. SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN RESPONDENT: GREESHMA, AGED 24 YEARS, D/O M.A. KRISHNA MANI, PARAMEL PADY STREET, KONDAZHY VILLAGE, TALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT-679 106. R1 BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 24th day of February 2021 A.Muhamed Mustaque, J The learned counsel for the appellant submits

that the matter has been settled out of Court.                    In
view    of   the   above,   he    is     not   pressing   the   Mat.
Appeal.      Accordingly, the Mat. Appeal is dismissed

as not pressed. All pending interlocutory applications, if any, are closed. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE C.S.DIAS PR