The Managing Director Vs Raman - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1681301
CourtChennai Orders High Court
Decided OnFeb-02-2026
Case NumberCMP(MD)/20448/2025
JudgeHonourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan,Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima
AppellantThe Managing Director
RespondentRaman
Excerpt:
cmp(md) no.20448 of 2025 in cma(md) sr.no.93602 of 2025g.k. ilanthiraiyan,j.andr. poornima,j.(order of the court was made by g.k.ilanthiraiyan,j.) this petition has been filed to condone the delay of 170 days in filing the above appeal.2. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. thelearned counsel appearing for the respondents objected to condone the delay. 3.being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.4. registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise inorder and post the appeal for admission in the usual course. registry isalso directed to print the name of respondent at the time of admission. [g.k.i.,j] & [r.p.,j] 02.02.2026 aav 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Judgment:

CMP(MD) No.20448 of 2025 in CMA(MD) Sr.No.93602 of 2025

G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.

AND

R. POORNIMA,J.

(Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.) This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 170 days in filing the above appeal.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The

learned counsel appearing for the respondents objected to condone the delay. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.

4. Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise in

order and post the appeal for admission in the usual course. Registry is

also directed to print the name of respondent at the time of admission. [G.K.I.,J] & [R.P.,J] 02.02.2026 aav 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis