Narendra Kumar Malik vs the State by - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1671903
CourtKarnataka Orders High Court
Decided OnJan-31-2025
Case NumberCRL.A/429/2012
JudgeV Srishananda
AppellantNarendra Kumar Malik
RespondentThe State by
Excerpt:
-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 31st day of january, 2025 before the hon'ble mr justice v srishananda criminal appeal no.429 of 2012 (c) between:1. narendra kumar malikaged about 67 years s/o late sant lal r/of no.bungalow-7 ganga estate, chembur, mumbai 400 071 maharashtra, kundalal halli …appellant (by sri praveen c, advocate) and:1. the state bycbi, bangalore …respondent (by sri p prasanna kumar, advocate) digitally signed by malatesh this crl.a is filed under section 374(2) cr.p.c kc praying to set aside the order dated 26.03.2012 location: passed by the xxi addl. city civil and s.j. and spl. high court of judge for cbi cases, bangalore in spl.c.c.no.21/1993karnataka convicting the appellant/accused for the offence p/u/s 120-b of ipc. this appeal, coming on for hearing, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr justice v srishananda -2-oral ordermemo filed, which reads as under: “the undersigned counsel appearing on behalf of appellant most respectfully submits: the counsel prays this hon’ble court to dismiss the appeal as abetted (abetted) as the demise of the appellant was intimated by the son of appellant. hence this memo”. in view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as abated. sd/- (v srishananda) judge kcm list no.: 1 sl no.: 0
Judgment:

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.429 OF 2012 (C) BETWEEN:

1. NARENDRA KUMAR MALIK

AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O LATE SANT LAL R/OF NO.BUNGALOW-7 GANGA ESTATE, CHEMBUR, MUMBAI 400 071 MAHARASHTRA, KUNDALAL HALLI …APPELLANT (BY SRI PRAVEEN C, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE BY

CBI, BANGALORE …RESPONDENT (BY SRI P PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by MALATESH THIS CRL.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 374(2) CR.P.C KC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 26.03.2012 Location: PASSED BY THE XXI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND S.J. AND SPL. HIGH COURT OF JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, BANGALORE IN SPL.C.C.NO.21/1993KARNATAKA CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 120-B OF IPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA -2-

ORAL ORDER

Memo filed, which reads as under: “The undersigned counsel appearing on behalf of appellant most respectfully submits: The counsel prays this Hon’ble Court to dismiss the appeal as abetted (ABETTED) as the demise of the appellant was intimated by the son of appellant. Hence this memo”. In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as abated. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0