Dharmalingam Vs Saravanakumar - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1665526
CourtChennai Orders High Court
Decided OnJan-30-2026
Case NumberCONT P(MD)/1832/2024
JudgeHonourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi
AppellantDharmalingam
RespondentSaravanakumar
Excerpt:
before the madurai bench of madras high court dated : 30/01/2026coramthe honourable mr. justice b.pugalendhi in w.p(md).no.21792 of 2018 dharmalingam, ... petitioner vs dindigul district.. ... respondent prayer :- contempt petition filed under section 11 of the contempt of courts act, 1971 to punish the respondent herein for his willful disobedience of the order passed by this court in wp(md). no.21792 of 2018, dated 26.03.2024. for petitioner : mr.n.rahamadullah, for respondent : mr.venkatesh kumar, special government pleader this contempt petition is filed that the order of this court in w.p(md). no.21792 of 2018 dated 26.03.2024 has not been complied with.2. the petitioner has approached this court seeking a writ ofmandamus, directing the tahsildar to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 07.08.20218, by considering the compromise decree passed in o.s.no.13 of 2015 on the file of the learned district munsif cum judicial magistrate court, natham.3. considering the rival submissions made, this court disposed of the writ petition on 26.03.2024 and the relevant paragraph is extracted hereunder:“considering the rival submissions made and also considering the prayer sought for in this writ petition, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to appear before the respondent on 14.04.2024 along with the required documents and the respondent shall consider the same and pass suitable orders within a period of eight weeks from thereon.”4. the learned special government pleader appearing for therespondent by referring to the proceedings of the tahsildar dated 29.01.2018 submits that the representation of the writ petitioner was considered and patta has also been issued to the petitioner.5. considering the relief granted in the writ petition, this contempt petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 30.01.2026 tta to dindigul district.. b.pugalendhi,j tta in cont p(md) no.1832 of 2024 date : 30/01/2026
Judgment:

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 30/01/2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI in W.P(MD).No.21792 of 2018 Dharmalingam, ... Petitioner Vs Dindigul District.. ... Respondent PRAYER :- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent herein for his willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in WP(MD). No.21792 of 2018, dated 26.03.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Rahamadullah, For Respondent : Mr.Venkatesh Kumar, Special Government Pleader This contempt petition is filed that the order of this Court in W.P(MD). No.21792 of 2018 dated 26.03.2024 has not been complied with.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a Writ of

Mandamus, directing the Tahsildar to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 07.08.20218, by considering the compromise decree passed in O.S.No.13 of 2015 on the file of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Natham.

3. Considering the rival submissions made, this Court disposed of the writ petition on 26.03.2024 and the relevant paragraph is extracted hereunder:

“Considering the rival submissions made and also considering the prayer sought for in this writ petition, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to appear before the respondent on 14.04.2024 along with the required documents and the respondent shall consider the same and pass suitable orders within a period of eight weeks from thereon.”

4. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the

respondent by referring to the proceedings of the Tahsildar dated 29.01.2018 submits that the representation of the writ petitioner was considered and patta has also been issued to the petitioner.

5. Considering the relief granted in the writ petition, this Contempt Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 30.01.2026 tta TO Dindigul District.. B.PUGALENDHI,J tta IN CONT P(MD) No.1832 of 2024 Date : 30/01/2026