Thomas vs Sindhu - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1659815
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnJan-27-2021
Case NumberRSA/670/2015
JudgeHonourable Mr.Justice N.Anil Kumar
AppellantThomas
RespondentSindhu
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice n.anil kumar wednesday, the 27th day of january 2021 / 7th magha, 1942 as 44/2014 of sub court, perumbavoor os 230/2012 of munsiff court, perumbavoor appellant/s: thomas, s/o varkey, aged 66 years, palakunnel house, kadakkanad kara, by adv. sri.mathew sebastian respondent/s: 1 sindhu, w/o biju, aged 34 years, (now working at indian time house, m.c.p.building, kolencherry), pin-682 311. 2 akshay, s/o.biju, aged 17 years, (minor), represented by his mother sindhu, w/o.biju, pin-682 311. r1 by adv. sri.shiju varghese this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 27.01.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..2..judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal is not pressed. evidencing the same, a memo dated 18.01.2021 has been filed. recording the memo, the regular second appeal stands dismissed as not pressed. there will be noorder as to costs. pending applications, if any,stand closed. sd/- n.anil kumar judge bka/27.01.2021
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 7TH MAGHA, 1942 AS 44/2014 OF SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR OS 230/2012 OF MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR APPELLANT/S: THOMAS, S/O VARKEY, AGED 66 YEARS, PALAKUNNEL HOUSE, KADAKKANAD KARA, BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT/S: 1 SINDHU, W/O BIJU, AGED 34 YEARS, (NOW WORKING AT INDIAN TIME HOUSE, M.C.P.BUILDING, KOLENCHERRY), PIN-682 311. 2 AKSHAY, S/O.BIJU, AGED 17 YEARS, (MINOR), REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER SINDHU, W/O.BIJU, PIN-682 311. R1 BY ADV. SRI.SHIJU VARGHESE THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal is not pressed. Evidencing the same, a memo dated 18.01.2021 has been filed. Recording the memo, the Regular Second Appeal stands dismissed as not pressed. There will be no

order as to costs. Pending applications, if any,

stand closed. Sd/- N.ANIL KUMAR JUDGE Bka/27.01.2021