Prameela vs Chandran - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1476537
CourtKerala High Court
Decided OnFeb-28-2022
Case NumberMACA/2005/2011
JudgeHonourable Mr.Justice C.S.Dias
AppellantPrameela
RespondentChandran
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias monday, the 28th day of february 2022 / 9th phalguna, 1943 against the award in op(mv) 1635/2003 of addl. motor accident claims tribunal ,thrissur appellant/petitioners 1 prameela w/o babu, aruniparambil house, karuvannur, thrissur. 2 priya w/o madhu, karappanparambil house, avanoor, thrissur. by adv sri.p.v.chandra mohan respondents/respondents: 1 chandran s/o unni ezhuthachan, 11/252,paraparambil house , avanoor p.o, thrissur district- 680 001. 2 santhosh s/o ayyappan, karoor house, p.o, karoor, via. mundur, thrissur district- 680 001. by adv sri.c.e.unnikrishnan this motor accident claims appeal having come up for admission on 28.02.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdespite the orders dated 27.9.2021 and 13.1.2022, the appellants have not taken steps to effect service of notice on the 2nd respondent. the appeal is of the year2011. it is assumed that the appellants are no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. sd/- c.s.dias ma/28.2.2022 judge /true copy/
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1943 AGAINST THE AWARD IN OP(MV) 1635/2003 OF ADDL. MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,THRISSUR APPELLANT/PETITIONERS 1 PRAMEELA W/O BABU, ARUNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KARUVANNUR, THRISSUR. 2 PRIYA W/O MADHU, KARAPPANPARAMBIL HOUSE, AVANOOR, THRISSUR. BY ADV SRI.P.V.CHANDRA MOHAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 CHANDRAN S/O UNNI EZHUTHACHAN, 11/252,PARAPARAMBIL HOUSE , AVANOOR P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT- 680 001. 2 SANTHOSH S/O AYYAPPAN, KAROOR HOUSE, P.O, KAROOR, VIA. MUNDUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT- 680 001. BY ADV SRI.C.E.UNNIKRISHNAN THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Despite the orders dated 27.9.2021 and 13.1.2022, the appellants have not taken steps to effect service of notice on the 2nd respondent. The appeal is of the year

2011. It is assumed that the appellants are no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. Sd/- C.S.DIAS ma/28.2.2022 JUDGE /True copy/