Abraham vs Mamman - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1344335
CourtKerala High Court
Decided OnMay-30-2023
Case NumberCRP/1339/2004
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice P.Somarajan
AppellantAbraham
RespondentMamman
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan tuesday, the 30th day of may 2023 / 9th jyaishta, 1945 against the order/judgment in cma 15/2000 of sub court, muvattupuzha against the order in ia.119/98 in os 172/1998 of munsiff court, kolencherrryrevision petitioner(appellant/respondent: abraham, s/o varghese, cheruthottil house, thammanimattom kara, aikkaranadu south village, kunnathunadu taluk. by advs. sri.dinesh r.shenoy sri.jojo george respondent(respondent/petitioner): mamman, s/o ouseph, chakkummoottil house, thammanimattom kara, aikkaranadu south village, kunnathunadu taluk. by adv sri.k.k.chandran pillai this civil revision petition having come up for admission on 30.05.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:o r d e rthe learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the matter has become infructuous. hence, the crp will stand dismissed as infructuous. sd/- p.somarajan judge msp
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 9TH JYAISHTA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CMA 15/2000 OF SUB COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA.119/98 IN OS 172/1998 OF MUNSIFF COURT, KOLENCHERRRY

REVISION PETITIONER(APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: ABRAHAM, S/O VARGHESE, CHERUTHOTTIL HOUSE, THAMMANIMATTOM KARA, AIKKARANADU SOUTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY SRI.JOJO GEORGE RESPONDENT(RESPONDENT/PETITIONER): MAMMAN, S/O OUSEPH, CHAKKUMMOOTTIL HOUSE, THAMMANIMATTOM KARA, AIKKARANADU SOUTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. BY ADV SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Hence, the CRP will stand dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE msp