Krishnakumar B vs R. Muthukumar, - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1320151
CourtKerala High Court
Decided OnMay-31-2024
Case NumberCon.Case(C)/862/2024
JudgeHonourable Mr.Justice N.Nagaresh
AppellantKrishnakumar B
RespondentR. Muthukumar,
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice n.nagaresh friday, the 31st day of may 2024 / 10th jyaishta, 1946 con.case(c) no. 862 of 2024 against the judgment in wp(c) no.467 of 2024 of high court of kerala petitioner/petitioner: 1 krishnakumar b aged 57 years s/o. bhargavan, residing at tc 93/310, 'krishna' anayara post, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695029 2 smitha krishnakumar aged 49 years w/o. krishnakumar, residing at tc 93/310, 'krishna' anayara post, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695029 by adv k.c.eldho respondents/respondents 2 ot 4 1 r. muthukumar, the executive engineer, kerala road fund board chandrasekharan nair stadium road, palayam, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695033 2 geetha m. the chief engineer (distribution), kerala state electricity board ltd., (kseb) power house building, power house road thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695036 3 g. venugopal (father's name and age not known to the petitioner) assistant engineer, office of the assistant engineer, electrical section, pettah pattoor, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695035 sri.k.v. manojkumar-r1 sri.a. arunkumar-r2 this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 31.05.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 31st day of may, 2024 the petitioners have approached this court subsequently with w.p.(c) no.14142/2024. the said writ petition stands allowed with a direction to the respondents to shift the transformer to a safer location.2. in view of the subsequent developments, i am of theview that this contempt of court case need not be further prosecuted for the time being. recording the afore facts, the contempt of court case is closed. sd/- n.nagaresh judge spk appendix of con.case(c) 862/2024 petitioner annexures annexure a1 the certified copy of the judgment in wp(c) no.467 of 2024 of this court dated 22/1/2024 annexure a2 a true photographs showing red marking on the compound wall adjacent to the petitioners house annexure a3 a true copy of the covering letter communicated to the respondent by registered post dated 30/1/2024annexure a4 the postal receipt of annexure a3 annexure a5 a true copy of the order dated annexure a6 true photographs of the explosion on annexure a7 a true copy of the reply message issueto the petitioner
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1946 CON.CASE(C) NO. 862 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.467 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/PETITIONER: 1 KRISHNAKUMAR B AGED 57 YEARS S/O. BHARGAVAN, RESIDING AT TC 93/310, 'KRISHNA' ANAYARA POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695029 2 SMITHA KRISHNAKUMAR AGED 49 YEARS W/O. KRISHNAKUMAR, RESIDING AT TC 93/310, 'KRISHNA' ANAYARA POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695029 BY ADV K.C.ELDHO RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 2 OT 4 1 R. MUTHUKUMAR, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA ROAD FUND BOARD CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR STADIUM ROAD, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 2 GEETHA M. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (DISTRIBUTION), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD., (KSEB) POWER HOUSE BUILDING, POWER HOUSE ROAD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695036 3 G. VENUGOPAL (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) ASSISTANT ENGINEER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, PETTAH PATTOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695035 SRI.K.V. MANOJKUMAR-R1 SRI.A. ARUNKUMAR-R2 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 31st day of May, 2024 The petitioners have approached this Court subsequently with W.P.(C) No.14142/2024. The said writ petition stands allowed with a direction to the respondents to shift the transformer to a safer location.

2. In view of the subsequent developments, I am of the

view that this Contempt of Court Case need not be further prosecuted for the time being. Recording the afore facts, the Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/- N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 862/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.467 OF 2024 OF THIS COURT DATED 22/1/2024 Annexure A2 A TRUE PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING RED MARKING ON THE COMPOUND WALL ADJACENT TO THE PETITIONERS HOUSE Annexure A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER COMMUNICATED TO THE RESPONDENT BY REGISTERED POST DATED 30/1/2024

Annexure A4         THE POSTAL RECEIPT OF ANNEXURE A3
Annexure A5         A   TRUE  COPY    OF   THE   ORDER   DATED
Annexure A6         TRUE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EXPLOSION ON
Annexure A7         A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY MESSAGE ISSUE

TO THE PETITIONER