Muhammed Baseeth vs Shereena - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1296125
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnMar-13-2024
Case NumberRPFC/320/2023
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice P.Somarajan
AppellantMuhammed Baseeth
RespondentShereena
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan wednesday, the 13th day of march 2024 / 23rd phalguna, 1945 against the order/judgment dated in mc no.229 of 2018 of family court, palakkad revision petitioner/counter petitioner: muhammed baseeth aged 38 years s/o. abdul azeez, r/a thazhathepeediyakka veedu, mangalam dam vilage, alathur taluk., pin - 678706basil mathew aaromal thulasi respondents/petitioners: 1 shereena aged 32 years d/o. kammukutty, bismilla manzil, alathur taluk, pin - 678706 *2 ameen muhammed aged 14 years (minor),(corrected) bismilla manzil, alathur taluk -678706 *3 ayan muhammed aged 9 years (minor), bismilla manzil, (corrected) alathur taluk-678706 * 2nd and 3rd minor respondents are represented by 1st respondent, as per the order dated abraham samson lovely samson(k/86-a/1999) this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 13.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:orderthe revision petitioner and the counsel remained absent. there was no representation. the counsel for the respondent is present in person and ready with the matter. it is against the order of maintenance the husband came up. this would show what is behind it. hence, the absence of the counsel cannot be condoned. the rpfc will stand dismissed for non- prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan judge spv
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN MC NO.229 OF 2018 OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD REVISION PETITIONER/COUNTER PETITIONER: MUHAMMED BASEETH AGED 38 YEARS S/O. ABDUL AZEEZ, R/A THAZHATHEPEEDIYAKKA VEEDU, MANGALAM DAM VILAGE, ALATHUR TALUK., PIN - 678706

BASIL MATHEW AAROMAL THULASI RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS: 1 SHEREENA AGED 32 YEARS D/O. KAMMUKUTTY, BISMILLA MANZIL, ALATHUR TALUK, PIN - 678706 *2 AMEEN MUHAMMED AGED 14 YEARS (MINOR),(CORRECTED) BISMILLA MANZIL, ALATHUR TALUK -678706 *3 AYAN MUHAMMED AGED 9 YEARS (MINOR), BISMILLA MANZIL, (CORRECTED) ALATHUR TALUK-678706 * 2ND AND 3RD MINOR RESPONDENTS ARE REPRESENTED BY 1ST RESPONDENT, AS PER THE ORDER DATED ABRAHAM SAMSON LOVELY SAMSON(K/86-A/1999) THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The revision petitioner and the counsel remained absent. There was no representation. The counsel for the respondent is present in person and ready with the matter. It is against the order of maintenance the husband came up. This would show what is behind it. Hence, the absence of the counsel cannot be condoned. The RPFC will stand dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE SPV