Favaz vs Nazrin - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1281904
SubjectRight to Information
CourtKerala Orders High Court
Decided OnApr-02-2025
Case NumberRPFC/99/2016
JudgeHonourable Dr. Justice Kauser Edappagath
AppellantFAVAZ
RespondentNazrin
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable dr. justice kauser edappagath wednesday, the 2nd day of april 2025 / 12th chaithra, 1947 rpfc no. 99 of 2016 against the order dated 18.01.2016 in mc no.160 of 2013 of family court,thrissur revision petitioner/respondent: favaz s/o.abdul rasak, korattiparambil house, engandiyoor village, kundaliyur, chavakkad. by advs. sri.s.u.nazar sri.mansoor.b.h. respondents/petitioners: 1 nazrin d/o.ismail, melepurayidathil house, p.o.kallur, amballur, thrissur - 680 024. 2 minor ayan 10 months (represented by the first respondent/ mother). by adv. sri.m.premchand this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 02.04.2025, the court on the same day delivered the following: rpfc no.99 of 2016orderthe learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petition is not pressed. the said submission is recorded. accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge br
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RPFC NO. 99 OF 2016 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18.01.2016 IN MC NO.160 OF 2013 OF FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: FAVAZ S/O.ABDUL RASAK, KORATTIPARAMBIL HOUSE, ENGANDIYOOR VILLAGE, KUNDALIYUR, CHAVAKKAD. BY ADVS. SRI.S.U.NAZAR SRI.MANSOOR.B.H. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS: 1 NAZRIN D/O.ISMAIL, MELEPURAYIDATHIL HOUSE, P.O.KALLUR, AMBALLUR, THRISSUR - 680 024. 2 MINOR AYAN 10 MONTHS (REPRESENTED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT/ MOTHER). BY ADV. SRI.M.PREMCHAND THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RPFC NO.99 OF 2016

ORDER

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petition is not pressed. The said submission is recorded. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE BR