Krishnankutty vs Mohanakumar - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1280225
SubjectMotor Vehicles
CourtKerala High Court
Decided OnNov-24-2021
Case NumberMACA/380/2013
JudgeHonourable Mr.Justice C.S.Dias
AppellantKrishnankutty
RespondentMohanakumar
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias wednesday, the 24th day of november 2021 / 3rd agrahayana, maca no. 380 of 2013 against the order/judgment in opmv 318/2005 of motor accident claims tribunal ,attingal, thiruvananthapuramappellant/s: krishnankutty pathiriyodu kaithakuzhi roadarikathu veedu velloorkonam, pacha po nedumangadu by advs. sri.r.t.pradeep sri.p.bijimon respondent/s: 1 mohanakumar mohana vilasam, pulimoodu, perila, chullimanoor p.o, nedumangadu 2 the manager united india insurance co ltd ash-har complex palace road, attingal 696101 by adv smt.raji t.bhaskar this motor accident claims appeal having come up for admission on 24.11.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:c.s.dias, j.dated this the 24th day of november, 2021.judgmentdespite the order dated 12.8.2015, the appellant has not taken steps to effect service of notice on the first respondent. the appeal is of the year 2013. it is assumed that the appellant is no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. sd/- sks/24.11.2021 c.s.dias, judge
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA, MACA NO. 380 OF 2013 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPMV 318/2005 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

APPELLANT/S: KRISHNANKUTTY PATHIRIYODU KAITHAKUZHI ROADARIKATHU VEEDU VELLOORKONAM, PACHA PO NEDUMANGADU BY ADVS. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.P.BIJIMON RESPONDENT/S: 1 MOHANAKUMAR MOHANA VILASAM, PULIMOODU, PERILA, CHULLIMANOOR P.O, NEDUMANGADU 2 THE MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ASH-HAR COMPLEX PALACE ROAD, ATTINGAL 696101 BY ADV SMT.RAJI T.BHASKAR THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

C.S.DIAS, J.

Dated this the 24th day of November, 2021.

JUDGMENT

Despite the order dated 12.8.2015, the appellant has not taken steps to effect service of notice on the first respondent. The appeal is of the year 2013. It is assumed that the appellant is no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. Sd/- sks/24.11.2021 C.S.DIAS, JUDGE