Deepak Bhalla vs Hyper Stealth Technologies Pvt. Ltd & Anr. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1259937
SubjectEducation
CourtDelhi High Court
Decided OnMar-25-2026
Case NumberCM(M)/628/2026
JudgeHon'Ble Mr. Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
AppellantDeepak Bhalla
RespondentHyper Stealth Technologies Pvt. Ltd & Anr.
Advocates:Mr. Shivek Trehan, Mr. Akash Chandna, Ms. Mainka Pandey
Excerpt:
* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ cm(m) 628/2026 deepak bhalla .....petitioner through: mr. shivek trehan, mr. akash chandna and ms. mainka pandey, advocates.versushyper stealth technologies pvt. ltd &anr......respondents through: none.coram:hon'ble mr. justice rajneesh kumar guptaorder% 25.03.20261. this hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.cm appl. 18920/2026(for exemption)2. allowed, subject to all just exceptions. application is disposed of.cm(m) 628/20263. the present petition has been filed by the petitioner under article 227of the constitution of india, 1950, seeking directions to the trial court to hear and dispose of the respondent/plaintiff’s application under order xxxix rules 1 and 2 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 in cs (os) no. 611/2025 within a time-bound schedule.4. heard. record perused.5. the trial court is proceeding with matters pending before it inaccordance with its own board and pendency of the cases. in such circumstances, it would not be appropriate to pass any directions to the trial court to decide the matter within a time bound manner.6. accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. pendingapplication(s), if any, also stand disposed of.rajneesh kumar gupta, jmarch 25, 2026/nd/ik
Judgment:

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CM(M) 628/2026 DEEPAK BHALLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shivek Trehan, Mr. Akash Chandna and Ms. Mainka Pandey, Advocates.

versus

HYPER STEALTH TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD &ANR.

.....Respondents Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

ORDER

% 25.03.2026

1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.

CM APPL. 18920/2026(for exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

CM(M) 628/2026

3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227

of the Constitution of India, 1950, seeking directions to the Trial Court to hear and dispose of the respondent/plaintiff’s application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in CS (OS) No. 611/2025 within a time-bound schedule.

4. Heard. Record perused.

5. The Trial Court is proceeding with matters pending before it in

accordance with its own board and pendency of the cases. In such circumstances, it would not be appropriate to pass any directions to the Trial Court to decide the matter within a time bound manner.

6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending

application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J

MARCH 25, 2026/nd/ik