Surender Singh vs.state & Ors - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1226778
SubjectEducation
CourtDelhi High Court
Decided OnNov-19-2019
AppellantSurender Singh
RespondentState & Ors
Excerpt:
$~55 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:19. 11.2019 + crl.m.c. 5854/2019 surender singh ........ petitioner through mr. manish bansal, adv with petitioner in person versus state & ors. through mr. k k ghai, app for state ........ respondents si pukhraj, ps prashant vihar mr. roshan lal goel & ms. anju gupta, advs. for r-2 to 7 with respondents in person coram: hon'ble mr. justice suresh kumar kait judgment (oral) crl. m.a. 40531/2019 1.2. allowed, subject to all just exceptions. application is disposed of. crl.m.c.5854/2019 3. vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing fir no.253/2018 dated 22.05.2018, registered at p.s. prashant vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. crl.m.c.5854/2019 page 1 of 3 4.5. notice issued. notice is accepted by learned app for the state and counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 7.6. with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. the present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent nos. 2 to 7 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.8. respondent no.2 to 7 are personally present in court with learned counsel and have been identified by si pukhraj/io, p.s. prashant vihar and submit that the matter has been settled and they do not wish to prosecute the matter any further.9. the petitioner and respondent nos.2 to 7 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement agreement dated 06.09.2019 before the delhi high court mediation & conciliation centre, copy whereof has been placed on record along with the instant petition as annexure-b.10. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further. crl.m.c.5854/2019 page 2 of 3 11. for the reasons afore-recorded, fir no.253/2018 dated 22.05.2018, registered at p.s. prashant vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.12. the petition is allowed accordingly.13. order dasti. (suresh kumar kait) judge november19 2019 sm crl.m.c.5854/2019 page 3 of 3
Judgment:

$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:

19. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5854/2019 SURENDER SINGH ........ Petitioner

Through Mr. Manish Bansal, Adv with petitioner in person versus STATE & ORS. Through Mr. K K Ghai, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS

SI Pukhraj, PS Prashant Vihar Mr. Roshan Lal goel & Ms. Anju Gupta, Advs. for R-2 to 7 with respondents in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) CRL. M.A. 40531/2019 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.5854/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.253/2018 dated 22.05.2018, registered at P.S. Prashant Vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C.5854/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.

5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 7.

6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent Nos. 2 to 7 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.

8. Respondent No.2 to 7 are personally present in Court with learned counsel and have been identified by SI Pukhraj/IO, P.S. Prashant Vihar and submit that the matter has been settled and they do not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9. The petitioner and respondent nos.2 to 7 have entered into an amicable settlement vide Settlement Agreement dated 06.09.2019 before the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre, copy whereof has been placed on record along with the instant petition as Annexure-B.

10. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further. CRL.M.C.5854/2019 Page 2 of 3 11. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.253/2018 dated 22.05.2018, registered at P.S. Prashant Vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

12. The petition is allowed accordingly.

13. Order dasti. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE NOVEMBER19 2019 sm CRL.M.C.5854/2019 Page 3 of 3